Sighting Early Nov., Boznia

[Eagle1]

According to the Updates thread, a man believes he saw Maddie with a couple in Boznia. So, the Moroccan official may have known she's been transferred, if she has been.

Big question, why are they flaunting her, taking her out so much so she can be sighted? Testing their ability to get away with it?

[Eagle1]

The anonymous Irish witness at the Shrine in Bosnia said he took down the license number, and even if he's wrong, he at least tried.

They came up with a little girl named Tea Dedic, the usual routine. Too usual? If she really was yelling "I want my daddy," is this part of a coverup?

How could the witness have been mistaken about that? Did he hear her yelling "I want my daddy," and see a hand put over her mouth as she was being shoved into the back seat of a car? The way this has been going, always the native child explanation for sightings, I for one tend to believe the witness more than the authorities, who've even refused to let police ask the McCanns their 100 more questions.

Those "friends" say they fear their own lives would be ruined if they amend their stories. Gerry is a gov't doctor, evidently, very high profile. Could someone be trying to make him do something or cover for something by holding his child hostage and he wouldn't know who?That doesn't make sense, right? What then? Somebody with a better brain than mine please think of something. There may not be much time to save Maddie, for all we know.

[andU]

The anonymous Irish witness at the Shrine in Bosnia said he took down the license number, and even if he's wrong, he at least tried.

They came up with a little girl named Tea Dedic, the usual routine. Too usual? If she really was yelling "I want my daddy," is this part of a coverup?

How could the witness have been mistaken about that? Did he hear her yelling "I want my daddy," and see a hand put over her mouth as she was being shoved into the back seat of a car? The way this has been going, always the native child explanation for sightings, I for one tend to believe the witness more than the authorities, who've even refused to let police ask the McCanns their 100 more questions.

Those "friends" say they fear their own lives would be ruined if they amend their stories. Gerry is a gov't doctor, evidently, very high profile. Could someone be trying to make him do something or cover for something by holding his child hostage and he wouldn't know who?That doesn't make sense, right? What then? Somebody with a better brain than mine please think of something. There may not be much time to save Maddie, for all we know.

Wish Jayelles were here; she could explain the type of doctor and what (if any) political involvement there would be. She gave great insight to the UK side of this case, IMO.

[Jayelles]

Wish Jayelles were here; she could explain the type of doctor and what (if any) political involvement there would be. She gave great insight to the UK side of this case, IMO.

Gerry is NOT a Government doctor. Eagle has been told this several times (and not just by me).

He works for the National Health Service - as do the vast majority of doctors here. He is a heart consultant and probably earns about £75k per annum (about $150,000).

The progression is that when students finish medical school, they do a training stint - usually in a hospital where they are called "housemen" or "house doctors". They are the bottom of the heap and used to work very long hours (this has improved recently). When they have finished this stint, they can go into general practice or specialise in some area. There are two levels of specialist - Registrar and Consultant. They are both fully qualified, but Consultant is senior (there are different level of Consultant too - kind of a management structure thing). If you require surgery, it might be the Consultant or his Registrar who does it. Gerry McCann is a Consultant. He's a rising star by all accounts and has lectured all over the world on some particular topic. But he is NOT a "Government" doctor any more than I am a "Government" teacher! It's very misleading to say this as I'm sure there ARE Government doctors who have a close contact with the Government. He is just a bog-standard NHS doctor.

It's defnitely not the same thing.

[One2Snoop]

Gerry is NOT a Government doctor. Eagle has been told this several times (and not just by me).

He works for the National Health Service - as do the vast majority of doctors here. He is a heart consultant and probably earns about £75k per annum (about $150,000).

The progression is that when students finish medical school, they do a training stint - usually in a hospital where they are called "housemen" or "house doctors". They are the bottom of the heap and used to work very long hours (this has improved recently). When they have finished this stint, they can go into general practice or specialise in some area. There are two levels of specialist - Registrar and Consultant. They are both fully qualified, but Consultant is senior (there are different level of Consultant too - kind of a management structure thing). If you require surgery, it might be the Consultant or his Registrar who does it. Gerry McCann is a Consultant. He's a rising star by all accounts and has lectured all over the world on some particular topic. But he is NOT a "Government" doctor any more than I am a "Government" teacher! It's very misleading to say this as I'm sure there ARE Government doctors who have a close contact with the Government. He is just a bog-standard NHS doctor.

It's defnitely not the same thing.

I had never heard anything about Gerry being a government doctor either. Thanks for clarifying Jayelles. :rose:

[Jayelles]

I had never heard anything about Gerry being a government doctor either. Thanks for clarifying Jayelles. :rose:

I should add that the NHS isn't even managed by Central Government but rather by local government (Local Authorities) as are schools. Central Government allocates money to the LAs and they use this to fund hospitals and "Primary Care" (GP practices). Some LAs are better at this than others and there are huge discrepancies in care. No-one here would consider an NHS doctor as a "Government" doctor

[andU]

Gerry is NOT a Government doctor. Eagle has been told this several times (and not just by me).

He works for the National Health Service - as do the vast majority of doctors here. He is a heart consultant and probably earns about £75k per annum (about $150,000).

The progression is that when students finish medical school, they do a training stint - usually in a hospital where they are called "housemen" or "house doctors". They are the bottom of the heap and used to work very long hours (this has improved recently). When they have finished this stint, they can go into general practice or specialise in some area. There are two levels of specialist - Registrar and Consultant. They are both fully qualified, but Consultant is senior (there are different level of Consultant too - kind of a management structure thing). If you require surgery, it might be the Consultant or his Registrar who does it. Gerry McCann is a Consultant. He's a rising star by all accounts and has lectured all over the world on some particular topic. But he is NOT a "Government" doctor any more than I am a "Government" teacher! It's very misleading to say this as I'm sure there ARE Government doctors who have a close contact with the Government. He is just a bog-standard NHS doctor.

It's defnitely not the same thing.

Thank you, Jayelles!

[Jayelles]

Semantics, government connections or gov't doctor, fine with me either way.

It is absolutely NOT the same thing. "Government connections" could mean your uncle is an MP or that you play golf with the Chancellor ever second Saturday. "Government Doctor" suggests that the person is a doctor and is employed by the Government to work for the Government - perhaps as an advisor or perhaps to provide medical services for member of the Government.

Gerry McCann works for a NHS hospital in England and he treats members of the public. His Local Authority pay his wages in the same way as they pay the wages of the dustbinmen and teachers. Are you going to suggest that the local binmen also have "Government connections" since they are employed by the Local Authorities?

We are not electing a president of the forum, based on just one platform point, sources, grandstanding about it,

No-one suggested we were. All we ask is that people stick to facts and provide sources for statements of fact as per TOS.


when nobody but Odette is posting any, that I know of. Haven't noticed any from anyone else, especially the complainers. It's like stalking and political mudslinging the way they seem to follow me, as if we're electing a president of the forum, based on only one "platform", trying to get Eagle. I'm not even saying anything big, I know everyone else will agree.

Remember how I once defended Evening 2 in JBR about being ganged up on by two people? Yoohoo, Ev2, I need to call in a favor. But I don't think she's here, so somebody else feel free.

This harrassing me helps find Maddie how?

[Eagle1]

I'm just watching for mods to finally notice the continual rudeness to me.

Why is it not happening, as it would to the rest of us? Have we lost Rieviera? (I do remember it was a long time with Solace. And this is by no means the most rude quarreling I've been complimented for ignoring, but ignoring isn't working.)

I have at times defended some of you being ganged-up on. Maybe you're wondering as I am, why so much concern about what kind of doctor rather than how to find Maddie, because it's a welcome distraction for some reason?

Murat has complained almost as much as the McCanns and I believe it's a legit question, why is he not being defended, out of a "kindness" motive, when nobody's picking on him or the McCanns, if kindness is really the motive.

I hate to say it but could someone here be a partner with Kate in some of the secret organizations for personal power we don't yet know about? Isn't some gov't involvement being revealed?

Twisting my words will be attempted, so remember I put that in the form of a question to be watched, not a statement.

I'm cautious as you all apparently are about such things which I'm sure are temporary. Things like this are in prophecy. Not claiming to know specific ones. FWIW, I've heard that Hitler and other dictators always had people they picked on to get attention. The Jews in that one example. I'm really not interested in politics, so didn't make notes about others in history.

[Jayelles]

I'm just watching for mods to finally notice the continual rudeness to me.

Why is it not happening, as it would to the rest of us? Have we lost Rieviera? (I do remember it was a long time with Solace. And this is by no means the most rude quarreling I've been complimented for ignoring, but ignoring isn't working.)

I have at times defended some of you being ganged-up on. Maybe you're wondering as I am, why so much concern about what kind of doctor rather than how to find Maddie, because it's a welcome distraction for some reason?

Murat has complained almost as much as the McCanns and I believe it's a legit question, why is he not being defended, out of a "kindness" motive, when nobody's picking on him or the McCanns, if kindness is really the motive.

I hate to say it but could someone here be a partner with Kate in some of the secret organizations for personal power we don't yet know about? Isn't some gov't involvement being revealed?

Twisting my words will be attempted, so remember I put that in the form of a question to be watched, not a statement.

I'm cautious as you all apparently are about such things which I'm sure are temporary. Things like this are in prophecy. Not claiming to know specific ones. FWIW, I've heard that Hitler and other dictators always had people they picked on to get attention. The Jews in that one example. I'm really not interested in politics, so didn't make notes about others in history.

You say it's not important whether he is a Government doctor or not - but IMO it IS important if it's not true and it's being used to support a suggestion that the Government are involved in a cover-up because of his connections to the Government!

I have been asked by several posters to explain Gerry's job position due to the fact that I live in the UK.

If people are going to speculate about the case based on facts - fair enough, but if the speculation is based upon misinformation, surely others will want to know this? People generally do not like being led down the wrong track.