Oj's latest interview

[LindaA]

Just dropping in from the JBR thread to post this link to an upcoming OJ interview. Strange!



http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/TV/11/15/simpsoninterview.ap/index.html[/URL]

[concerto]

That is disgusting. I just wrote to my local FOX affiliate and FOX news that if they air that slimeoid it will be the last day I watch either channel.

[Mandysmom]

He is a disgusting pos.

Does he not think at all about his kids?

Well no wait of course not, or he wouldn't have murdered their mama imo.
:flamemad:

[LindaA]

Sorry. I didn't see the post below about this same interview.

[sweetcharlotte]

fwiw

http://www.charter.net/news/read.php?ps=1016&id=13239491&_LT=HOME_LARSDCCL1_UNEWS

[LindaA]

Hi, Sweet, good to see you. You link is to essentially the same story as mine. How many of you will be at Borders when it opens to buy his book? :lol:

[Americ@nBe@utyX]

I can't stand OJ because I think he did it, but I'm curious to hear what he'll say. the more he opens his mouth, the more he confirms my theory of guilt.
i feel like he's just rubbing it in, the double jeopardy law protects him from being tried again. oj is jabbing at the families below the belt and I don't like it one bit!

[sweetcharlotte]

Originally posted by LindaA
Hi, Sweet, good to see you. You link is to essentially the same story as mine. How many of you will be at Borders when it opens to buy his book? :lol:

I won't buy it, but will put my name on the list at the library. :)

What are we going to do when CL shuts down? I feel withdrawal coming on already!

[cryostate]

I am disgusted by this publicity stunt and cannot understand where he is coming from. Is he going to really tell us how we "would have" committed the crime? Even if he did not do it (and he did), how sick is that to put yourself into the mind of a killer and tell us what you would have done? Since he did commit the crime, it's even sicker. He is a psychopath. I wish he would go away, because he has lost all sense of credibility in our society.

[chimin' in]

Yes, ITA with all of you! Sick, sick, sick.

I can't believe anyone would want to hear what he has to say about anything. I hope everyone boycotts his book. I applaud any network that refuses to air anything about him. I think this is just revenge because the Goldberg family wanted to own his publicity rights.

He did it. No "ifs" about it. I yawn in his direction.

[LindaA]

Dunno what we'll do. Get some work done for a change, I guess!!

I must admit to beng curious about what OJ has to say, but I'm boycotting the book also. I won't put one penny in his pocket!!

[martin II]

Originally posted by cryostate
I am disgusted by this publicity stunt and cannot understand where he is coming from. Is he going to really tell us how we "would have" committed the crime? Even if he did not do it (and he did), how sick is that to put yourself into the mind of a killer and tell us what you would have done? Since he did commit the crime, it's even sicker. He is a psychopath. I wish he would go away, because he has lost all sense of credibility in our society.

All
yesterday on one of the networks there was a interview of a company that makes novelty pop up books. In one book there were pop ups of many celebrities. Oprah. britney etc. Included was a pop up of oj and the bronco moving down the highway (bronco ride) followed by le cars. The owner, When asked the purpose of such a item said 'IT'S ALL IN FUN. PEOPLE LIKE THIS TYPE STUFF"
martin II

[tazzybaby]

I agree with you guys! He just continues to exploit his children's mothers murder. I just can't believe he would continue to do this. I hope the Goldman's can find out how he is getting paid and take every cent! He is sick!

[LindaA]

I was just hearing on CNN that this is causing quite a bit of controversy. Wonder if some local stations will pull it.

[martin II]

Originally posted by LindaA
I was just hearing on CNN that this is causing quite a bit of controversy. Wonder if some local stations will pull it.

lindaA

re; local stations

I think it will be viewed during ratings month. The high ratings may make then feel better than the moral position.$$$$$$$$$$

martin II

[sassylassy]

Originally posted by LindaA
Dunno what we'll do. Get some work done for a change, I guess!!

I must admit to beng curious about what OJ has to say, but I'm boycotting the book also. I won't put one penny in his pocket!!

:shrug: I am buying it. I have to read what it's all about!

I have read all the books related to this case. so I will have to read this one.

[martin II]

Originally posted by tazzybaby
I agree with you guys! He just continues to exploit his children's mothers murder. I just can't believe he would continue to do this. I hope the Goldman's can find out how he is getting paid and take every cent! He is sick!

tazzy hi

if oj gets paid any money the goldmans will never see a penny.
That money, if he got any, may already be in a off shore account
out of reach of any creditor. imo

Some are upset because of what they see as a moral issue.(blood money) others may be up set at the idea of OJ receiving
$3.5 million for very little effort.imo
martin II

[socaldiva]

And "some" seem to worship him no matter what sick, disgusting thing he does :rolleyes:

[sassylassy]

Originally posted by socaldiva
And "some" seem to worship him no matter what sick, disgusting thing he does :rolleyes:

I guess that's because "some" think he didn't do it:shrug:

[martin II]

Originally posted by sassylassy


I guess that's because "some" think he didn't do it:shrug:

i don't see any worship indicated by those that plan to buy the book.
martin II

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by sassylassy


I guess that's because "some" think he didn't do it:shrug:

Even if you don't think he did it, how do you think Sydney & Justin feel about having their "Dad" write such a book?

[SlipperySlope]

Originally posted by martin II


lindaA

re; local stations

I think it will be viewed during ratings month. The high ratings may make then feel better than the moral position.$$$$$$$$$$

martin II

Is it just my perception, or has Fox News become OJ Pimpson's simp?????

There is little or no likelihood that profits from this public insult of a book, along with Fox's interview will be used to pay off the $33 million judgement against the Butcher of Brentwood.

IMHO, of course

:flamemad:

[sassylassy]

Originally posted by socaldiva


Even if you don't think he did it, how do you think Sydney & Justin feel about having their "Dad" write such a book?

I have no clue how Sydney & Justin feel about this book.
Nothing has been reported or said about them:shrug:

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by sassylassy


I have no clue how Sydney & Justin feel about this book.
Nothing has been reported or said about them:shrug:

Wow, you can't even imagine what that would be like. Ok....

[sassylassy]

Originally posted by socaldiva


Wow, you can't even imagine what that would be like. Ok....


you didn't ask me to imagine.

the word now is the kids support O.J Simpson with this book.
So there is your answer.

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by sassylassy

you didn't ask me to imagine.

the word now is the kids support O.J Simpson with this book.
So there is your answer.

Sure I did. I posted "how do you think Sydney & Justin feel about it".

Gallanter lies, so I'm not taking his word for it.

[daghda]

Originally posted by socaldiva


Sure I did. I posted "how do you think Sydney & Justin feel about it".

Gallanter lies, so I'm not taking his word for it.


socaldiva,

You may not believe him but they had to sign-off on the project since they'll be receiving the bulk of the royalties.

That way their father can avoid having to pay the Goldman's



Daghda

[sassylassy]

Originally posted by socaldiva


Sure I did. I posted "how do you think Sydney & Justin feel about it".

Gallanter lies, so I'm not taking his word for it.

To answer your question I think the kids love and support
O.J Simpson.

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by daghda

socaldiva,

You may not believe him but they had to sign-off on the project since they'll be receiving the bulk of the royalties.



Where did you hear/read this?

[sassylassy]

Originally posted by socaldiva


Where did you hear/read this?

Everyone has a hand in the pie. None of these ppl are working for free.

[daghda]

Originally posted by socaldiva


Where did you hear/read this?

One of the guests on Catherine Crier suggested that as one of the possible ways O J Simpson could skirt the civil verdict.



Daghda

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by daghda

One of the guests on Catherine Crier suggested that as one of the possible ways O J Simpson could skirt the civil verdict.
Daghda

Ok, thanks. Doesn't mean that's what will/has transpired, but it is a possibility.

[Wukong]

I for one will read this book very carefully. Most people who feel they have gotten away with a crime eventually get caught by talking too much. Although this book is touted as hypothetical, I don't believe OJ can do a whole book without revealing some truth; he's not that clever. There will be some facts in the book no matter how hard OJ tries to steer clear of the images he has in his head of the awful carnage he perpetrated on June 12th 1994.

[sassylassy]

Originally posted by Wukong
I for one will read this book very carefully. Most people who feel they have gotten away with a crime eventually get caught by talking too much. Although this book is touted as hypothetical, I don't believe OJ can do a whole book without revealing some truth; he's not that clever. There will be some facts in the book no matter how hard OJ tries to steer clear of the images he has in his head of the awful carnage he perpetrated on June 12th 1994. :beer:

[martin II]

Originally posted by Wukong
I for one will read this book very carefully. Most people who feel they have gotten away with a crime eventually get caught by talking too much. Although this book is touted as hypothetical, I don't believe OJ can do a whole book without revealing some truth; he's not that clever. There will be some facts in the book no matter how hard OJ tries to steer clear of the images he has in his head of the awful carnage he perpetrated on June 12th 1994.

wukong
regardless of the contents and whether oj makes no 'MISTAKES'
most of the book will be used by some to say 'SEE HE CONFESSED" in his own book. imo
martin II

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by martin II
*snip*
the book will be used by some to say 'SEE HE CONFESSED" in his own book. imo
martin II

And others will continue to make excuses that it's "just a book".

[MissOtisRegrets]

$4 1/2 million for your soul. Judith Regan, Fox television, OJ Simpson.

MOO

[Wukong]

Martin,

"Some" may read too much into the entire book; I will not be among them. OJ has had a long time to fabricate what he feels is an airtight scenario free from anything that directly implicates him. All one needs to do is read his civil trial testimony, read his first book and watch his dopy video to see this is true. I expect much of the same redirection in OJ's latest literary masterpiece. But I guarantee there will be moments in his soon to be released book that are borne from actual events; he can't help himself, his massive ego won't allow it.

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by MissOtisRegrets
$4 1/2 million for your soul. Judith Regan, Fox television, OJ Simpson.

MOO

Good to see you Miss O :seeya: I agree with you, except I don't think Simpson has a soul.

[martin II]

Originally posted by Wukong
Martin,

"Some" may read too much into the entire book; I will not be among them. OJ has had a long time to fabricate what he feels is an airtight scenario free from anything that directly implicates him. All one needs to do is read his civil trial testimony, read his first book and watch his dopy video to see this is true. I expect much of the same redirection in OJ's latest literary masterpiece. But I guarantee there will be moments in his soon to be released book that are borne from actual events; he can't help himself, his massive ego won't allow it.

wukong
I think it will all be a big tease. Full of nothing in the end. people will be pissed by the emptiness of it all and then they will attack after realizing they have been had by FOX the publisher etc.imo
martin II

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by martin II
*snip*
I think it will all be a big tease. Full of nothing in the end.

Of course it will be "full of nothing" if OJ wrote it :o

[martin II]

wukong
As expected there are many rumors about the contents of this book by oj. I heard that there is only one chapter dealing with this "IF I DID IT". Actual bundy murders.

At the point where one would expect the 'IF I DID IT ' explanation
oj is said to have BLACKED OUT.

Also on one of the cable stations, I don't remember which one because i was switching around, it was said that a person that was a prosecution witness in the trial actually wrote the part about the murders in this chapter. They did not give a name so i don't know if this is true or not. I think it was on CC.

:shrug:

martin II

[rovaan]

Originally posted by martin II
wukong
As expected there are many rumors about the contents of this book by oj. I heard that there is only one chapter dealing with this "IF I DID IT". Actual bundy murders.

At the point where one would expect the 'IF I DID IT ' explanation
oj is said to have BLACKED OUT.

Also on one of the cable stations, I don't remember which one because i was switching around, it was said that a person that was a prosecution witness in the trial actually wrote the part about the murders in this chapter. They did not give a name so i don't know if this is true or not. I think it was on CC.

:shrug:

martin II

Pablo Fenjves
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/472596p-397608c.html

[martin II]

Originally posted by rovaan


Pablo Fenjves
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/472596p-397608c.html


Fenjves is not talking ( i guess) and Regan says she has a excuse for her participation but her boyfriend says she is lying about the abuse. imo


:shrug:
martin II

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by martin II
*snip*
Regan says she has a excuse for her participation but her boyfriend says she is lying about the abuse. imo
:shrug:
martin II

Of course he says she's lying. Very typical. imo

[Kate Sachel]

Originally posted by martin II



Fenjves is not talking ( i guess) and Regan says she has a excuse for her participation but her boyfriend says she is lying about the abuse. imo


:shrug:
martin II

Her current boyfriend or the one she claims abused her?

Kate

[Kate Sachel]

Originally posted by Kate Sachel


Her current boyfriend or the one she claims abused her?

Kate

Never mind, as O have found the answer to my question.

It is her ex-boyfriend and the one she claims abused her. He is a Doctor of Psychiatry no less and there are individuals around here that are naive enough to believe that is going to openly admit beating his ex-girfriend and run the risk of destroying his career. Let's face it, who is going to see a doctor that admits to beating up women? Especially the woman who is the mother of his child? NO ONE.

Except maybe OJ Simpson.

Kate

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by Kate Sachel
*snip*

He is a Doctor of Psychiatry no less

This article says he lost his medical license at some point & went to prison.

http://www.drudgereport.com/flash1jr.htm

[martin II]

alla
her boyfriend lost his license when he was busted for selling marijuana. He claims Regan was a investor and he took the fall. (five years). He also claims that after the breakup with Regan. they were always 'TOGEATHER' when he came to n.y.
martin II

[Zold1]

Originally posted by SlipperySlope


Is it just my perception, or has Fox News become OJ Pimpson's simp?????

There is little or no likelihood that profits from this public insult of a book, along with Fox's interview will be used to pay off the $33 million judgement against the Butcher of Brentwood.

IMHO, of course

:flamemad:

Now you are talking censorship. Goldmans are on CNN. Watch that.

[Zold1]

Originally posted by martin II



Fenjves is not talking ( i guess) and Regan says she has a excuse for her participation but her boyfriend says she is lying about the abuse. imo


:shrug:
martin II

Wow. This was interesting!

[StarShine]

Originally posted by rovaan


Pablo Fenjves
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/472596p-397608c.html

OMG Pablo Fenjves is involved as a ghost writer for the book. :eek:

[Zold1]

Originally posted by StarShine


OMG Pablo Fenjves is involved as a ghost writer for the book. :eek:

Yes StarShine. You appear to be as shocked as I was. Go figure.

[Kate Sachel]

Originally posted by Zold1


Now you are talking censorship. Goldmans are on CNN. Watch that.

Perhaps she's talking "boycott", which is indeed as much a right as freedom of speech is.

Kate

[martin II]

Originally posted by Zold1


Yes StarShine. You appear to be as shocked as I was. Go figure.

Pablo Fenjves gave a time of hearing the dog bark that was in line with M Clarks timeline. 10:20 pm.

At the time that he testified he knew and was 'CLOSE' to J Regan
from their time at Inquirer.

Regan must have dreamed up the idea as it seems that she was the only one in a position to put all the parties togeather.

Regan must have put Fenjves with oj or the independant broker that had the rights. Then she offers the broker $3.5 mil for ojs story. She then arranges for the interview of oj and for fox to air it
to support the book sales.

She gets heat from some competitors which causes her to make public a statement about some prior abuse by a old boyfriend.
imo
martin II

[fbgweezer]

Originally posted by martin II


Pablo Fenjves gave a time of hearing the dog bark that was in line with M Clarks timeline. 10:20 pm.

At the time that he testified he knew and was 'CLOSE' to J Regan
from their time at Inquirer.

Regan must have dreamed up the idea as it seems that she was the only one in a position to put all the parties togeather.

Regan must have put Fenjves with oj or the independant broker that had the rights. Then she offers the broker $3.5 mil for ojs story. She then arranges for the interview of oj and for fox to air it
to support the book sales.

She gets heat from some competitors which causes her to make public a statement about some prior abuse by a old boyfriend.
imo
martin II What part of "It was orenthal's idea" did you not understand? The Butcher of Brentwood thought up this little project on his own. Wonder if he was trying to raise the bucks to pay his cable?

[martin II]

Originally posted by fbgweezer
What part of "It was orenthal's idea" did you not understand? The Butcher of Brentwood thought up this little project on his own. Wonder if he was trying to raise the bucks to pay his cable?

fbg

what i understand is that J Regan made that claim. It remains to be proven that this is true. Hopefully you understand that. imo
martin II

[fbgweezer]

Originally posted by martin II


fbg

what i understand is that J Regan made that claim. It remains to be proven that this is true. Hopefully you understand that. imo
martin II always martin's answer: if orenthal did something bad, someone else made him do it. Geez.:flamemad:

[martin II]

Originally posted by fbgweezer
always martin's answer: if orenthal did something bad, someone else made him do it. Geez.:flamemad:

weezer

J Regan said she did not pay oj but she refused to say who she did pay. She claimed that her boyfriend abused her for some time. he says that is not true. If you KNOW that oj came to her with the deal then give proof, otherwise it is just what J Regan claimed. imo
martin II

[fbgweezer]

"Simpson also accused the Goldman family -- which won a $33.5 million civil wrongful death judgment against him -- of "opening up those old wounds" on frequent TV appearances." http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/TV/11/22/simpson.interview.ap/index.html

There is absolutely no end to his shameful actions/words.

[Kate Sachel]

Originally posted by fbgweezer
"Simpson also accused the Goldman family -- which won a $33.5 million civil wrongful death judgment against him -- of "opening up those old wounds" on frequent TV appearances." http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/TV/11/22/simpson.interview.ap/index.html

There is absolutely no end to his shameful actions/words.

Truly astounding.

The bottom line, in my opinion, is this ... even if he was not the killer, his actions in the aftermath have been nothing short of malicious and disrespectful.

OJ Simpson has made it a point to joke and make light of the crimes committed against his ex-wife and Ron Goldman, and then has the absolute audacity to get offended or surprised when people say something negative about him.

Kate

[fbgweezer]

Originally posted by Kate Sachel


Truly astounding.

The bottom line, in my opinion, is this ... even if he was not the killer, his actions in the aftermath have been nothing short of malicious and disrespectful.

OJ Simpson has made it a point to joke and make light of the crimes committed against his ex-wife and Ron Goldman, and then has the absolute audacity to get offended or surprised when people say something negative about him.

Kate Seems to me that this kind of stuff highlights his antisocial and psychotic personality -- he thinks it's all about him!

[martin II]

Originally posted by fbgweezer
always martin's answer: if orenthal did something bad, someone else made him do it. Geez.:flamemad:

weezer
if you can give proof for your position that oj brought the book deal to Regan then i would agree with you that he did. otherwise
your position on this nissue is just a idea you have.imo

martin II

[Kate Sachel]

Originally posted by martin II


weezer
if you can give proof for your position that oj brought the book deal to Regan then i would agree with you that he did. otherwise
your position on this nissue is just a idea you have.imo

martin II

I think it is safe to say that at least the interview project was already underway before Judith Regan became involved, thus wiping out the argument that Judith Regan brought the idea to OJ.

Barbara Walters stated on "The View" that OJ Simpson's team originally brought the project to her and asked that she conduct the interview. She says that she was disgusted and advised his team that she would not partake in any portion of it.

Since we now know that Barbara Walters was the first to be approached reagrding the interview that went along with the promotion of the book, it would be my opinion that it would not make sense that Judith Regan would be the one to have brought the book deal and interview to OJ because otherwise wouldn't she have been conducting the interview from the get-go?

Kate

[fbgweezer]

Originally posted by martin II


weezer
if you can give proof for your position that oj brought the book deal to Regan then i would agree with you that he did. otherwise
your position on this nissue is just a idea you have.imo

martin II my post wasn't one way or the other as far as who "brought" the book deal. I was responding to your immediate post that it wasn't orenthal's fault no matter what.

[fbgweezer]

This guy just keeps getting stranger:

MIAMI - O.J. Simpson told The Associated Press he participated in the ill-fated “If I Did It” book and interview project for one reason — personal profit, acknowledging that any financial gain was “blood money.”

“This was an opportunity for my kids to get their financial legacy,” Simpson said in interviews this week with the AP after the book deal was abandoned by its publisher. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15851678/

[fbgweezer]

"He said Fred Goldman has helped drain his finances with "frivolous lawsuits," including one he brought recently attempting to deprive Simpson of the commercial rights to his name. Although Simpson prevailed in court he said he spent $17,000 in legal fees.

Simpson, 59, said his NFL pension pays only $1,700 a month and the private pension he amassed during the days when he was a popular TV pitchman and sports commentator is being halved next month because he has had to dip into the principal."

[martin II]

Originally posted by fbgweezer
my post wasn't one way or the other as far as who "brought" the book deal. I was responding to your immediate post that it wasn't orenthal's fault no matter what.

cnn
In the Miami radio interview, Simpson was asked point-blank if he killed the pair.

"Absolutely not, and I maintained my innocence from day one," he replied, adding a little later: "No matter what everybody wants to say, I didn't do it."

Simpson also said he told the writer, "I have nothing to confess."

As for the "If I Did It" title, he added: "That was their title. That's what they came up with. I didn't pitch anything. I don't make book deals."
http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/TV/11/22/simpson.interview.ap/index.html

[fbgweezer]

Originally posted by martin II


cnn
In the Miami radio interview, Simpson was asked point-blank if he killed the pair.

"Absolutely not, and I maintained my innocence from day one," he replied, adding a little later: "No matter what everybody wants to say, I didn't do it."

Simpson also said he told the writer, "I have nothing to confess."

As for the "If I Did It" title, he added: "That was their title. That's what they came up with. I didn't pitch anything. I don't make book deals."
http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/TV/11/22/simpson.interview.ap/index.html and we know orenthal wouldn't lie! LOL

[2L8 4A D8]

Originally posted by martin II

fbg

what i understand is that J Regan made that claim. It remains to be proven that this is true. Hopefully you understand that. imo
martin II
What part of your own post don't you understand? JMO and MOO!!

Originally posted by martin II

From Newsweek

<snipped>

Simpson himself has remained quiet. His attorney, Yale Galanter, could not be reached for comment. Regan, publisher of ReganBooks—which reportedly paid Simpson an advance of $3.5 million—told the Associated Press that Simpson came to her with the idea. She also did not respond to a request for comment.

<snipped>

Old Post 11-19-2006 10:41 AM

[martin II]

Originally posted by fbgweezer
and we know orenthal wouldn't lie! LOL

and Regan?
martin II

[martin II]

weezer
i would not be surprised if Regan gets bumped for this blunder.

I also noted that Denise is claiming that the publishing company
offered to give the browns and goldmans profits from the sale of the book which she claimed was offered as hush money. But it is reported that the goldmans said they did not see the gift offer as hush money. imo

martin II

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by martin II
weezer
i would not be surprised if Regan gets bumped for this blunder.

I also noted that Denise is claiming that the publishing company
offered to give the browns and goldmans profits from the sale of the book which she claimed was offered as hush money. But it is reported that the goldmans said they did not see the gift offer as hush money. imo

martin II

So what if Regan gets "bumped for this blunder". She will never be hated & seen as a double murderer.

The money was a "gift offer"? So the Browns & the Goldmans view it differently, so what?

[goatgirl]

Originally posted by rovaan


Pablo Fenjves
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/472596p-397608c.html

Hi Rovann :)

what an interesting connection!

Thanks for the link!

~~GoatGirl~~