OJ's new Book

[tazzybaby]

We have to discuss this! I cannot believe that he continues to try and profit off of his children's mothers murder. Whether you believe he did it or not, this is outrageous. I wonder if the Goldman's already knew about this and this is why they started a suit now?!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15066202/

They were just talking about this on the radio. They said that he goes into...."If I did it..." and he says that it was originally going to only be a threat. He says that there was an accomplice and that he grabbed the knife from him because he was over come with rage.


Simpson was a great football player. And, great football players are idolized. If he wanted to try and clean up his image then he should have used his football accomplishments and knowledge. Instead he chooses to exploit the murders. Nicole was not just an ex-girlfriend or just an ex-wife. She was the mother of his children. The children that he is suppose to look out for and have their best interests at heart. He is a joke this way. He cannot be taken seriously. I just don't understand how he can keep going with this.

:flamemad:

[fbgweezer]

Originally posted by tazzybaby
We have to discuss this! I cannot believe that he continues to try and profit off of his children's mothers murder. Whether you believe he did it or not, this is outrageous. I wonder if the Goldman's already knew about this and this is why they started a suit now?!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15066202/

They were just talking about this on the radio. They said that he goes into...."If I did it..." and he says that it was originally going to only be a threat. He says that there was an accomplice and that he grabbed the knife from him because he was over come with rage.


Simpson was a great football player. And, great football players are idolized. If he wanted to try and clean up his image then he should have used his football accomplishments and knowledge. Instead he chooses to exploit the murders. Nicole was not just an ex-girlfriend or just an ex-wife. She was the mother of his children. The children that he is suppose to look out for and have their best interests at heart. He is a joke this way. He cannot be taken seriously. I just don't understand how he can keep going with this.

:flamemad: He's a freak -- and he continues his freak shows. :cuss:

[martin II]

Originally posted by tazzybaby
We have to discuss this! I cannot believe that he continues to try and profit off of his children's mothers murder. Whether you believe he did it or not, this is outrageous. I wonder if the Goldman's already knew about this and this is why they started a suit now?!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15066202/

They were just talking about this on the radio. They said that he goes into...."If I did it..." and he says that it was originally going to only be a threat. He says that there was an accomplice and that he grabbed the knife from him because he was over come with rage.


Simpson was a great football player. And, great football players are idolized. If he wanted to try and clean up his image then he should have used his football accomplishments and knowledge. Instead he chooses to exploit the murders. Nicole was not just an ex-girlfriend or just an ex-wife. She was the mother of his children. The children that he is suppose to look out for and have their best interests at heart. He is a joke this way. He cannot be taken seriously. I just don't understand how he can keep going with this.

:flamemad:

tazzy hi

The judge in Goldmans current suite has issed a initial verdict ruling for OJ and against Fred. (see goat girls post)

if any of this is true i am sure that the publishing company realized that people would rather read about oj and the murders rather than how well he played football.

If they are paying him 3 mil they must have confidence that the book will be a success.

if oj did this hypothetical book it would be the same as what furhman called his hypothetical play scrip which many here had no problem with. imo
martin II

[2L8 4A D8]

Originally posted by tazzybaby

<snipped>

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15066202/

<snipped>

They were just talking about this on the radio. They said that he goes into...."If I did it..." and he says that it was originally going to only be a threat. He says that there was an accomplice and that he grabbed the knife from him because he was over come with rage.

Uh huh! GMAB! And if we all believe that...

<snipped>

I just don't understand how he can keep going with this.

:flamemad:

Hi Tazzy! As long as there is a market for his cr@p and people are willing to support him in any way, shape or form and believe OJ is "100% Innocent," you will "understand how he can keep going with this." OJ doesn't care how he pays the bills. He will keep on "pimping: himself if it brings him a buck under the table!

JMO and MOO!!

[martin II]

tazzy hi

i noticed that this report is made by a GOSSIP cloumist (sp)
and that this book has not been written as yet. imo
martin II

[martin II]

Originally posted by 2L8 4A D8


considering the number of books already written by PIMPS to make money off of oj, i guess he figures he is intitled to make a buck also imo
martin II

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by martin II


tazzy hi

The judge in Goldmans current suite has issed a initial verdict ruling for OJ and against Fred. (see goat girls post)

if any of this is true i am sure that the publishing company realized that people would rather read about oj and the murders rather than how well he played football.

If they are paying him 3 mil they must have confidence that the book will be a success.

if oj did this hypothetical book it would be the same as what furhman called his hypothetical play scrip which many here had no problem with. imo
martin II


Hi Martin,

I know about the tentative ruling. This does not close the door for it. I believe that the Goldman's should do something to try and stop this monster from profiting off the murder of his ex-wife. If I were in their position I would try.

Yes, controversy sells books/magazines/stories. You expect something like that out of the media, trash mag's and etc. But, where is his mind? He is the one who should say no way. Why would he stoop to trying to make money off of his ex-wife's (the children's mother) murder? He should be the protector of his children and their well being. He doesn't care about anything but himself.

It's funny that you try to insert Fuhrman into this. Fuhrman's play had nothing to do with a murder that he was tried for. It didn't affect his children's well being or demean his ex-wife.

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by martin II
tazzy hi

i noticed that this report is made by a GOSSIP cloumist (sp)
and that this book has not been written as yet. imo
martin II

Hi Martin,

Yeah, they are the same ones who said that OJ was working on making a show called "Juiced". You know, the one that he denied and then we saw the takes for it.

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by martin II


considering the number of books already written by PIMPS to make money off of oj, i guess he figures he is intitled to make a buck also imo
martin II

Those people are not the father of the victims children. They are not their protectors. They do not care how it affects them. OJ should. If OJ loved Nicole then he shouldn't exploit her. He should consider that his children actually loved their mother. I don't think he is entitled to make a buck off of something like this. You can believe that he is innocent all you like. You can defend him till your dying day. But, defending him making money off of this murder this way does not make sense.

[martin II]

Originally posted by tazzybaby


Hi Martin,

Yeah, they are the same ones who said that OJ was working on making a show called "Juiced". You know, the one that he denied and then we saw the takes for it.

tazzy hi

I guess we will have to wait to see if this book will ever be written
and what will be in it before we slap oj across his face imo
martin II

[martin II]

Originally posted by tazzybaby


Those people are not the father of the victims children. They are not their protectors. They do not care how it affects them. OJ should. If OJ loved Nicole then he shouldn't exploit her. He should consider that his children actually loved their mother. I don't think he is entitled to make a buck off of something like this. You can believe that he is innocent all you like. You can defend him till your dying day. But, defending him making money off of this murder this way does not make sense.

tazzy hi

did fred write a book?
martin II

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by martin II


tazzy hi

I guess we will have to wait to see if this book will ever be written
and what will be in it before we slap oj across his face imo
martin II

Hi Martin,

Yes, we will see. And, I'm sure it will come out soon. And, it seems that the book has already been written. I guess it will just depend on when it is released.

[martin II]

Originally posted by tazzybaby


Hi Martin,

Yes, we will see. And, I'm sure it will come out soon. And, it seems that the book has already been written. I guess it will just depend on when it is released.

TRAZZY HI

What you have so far is a Gossip columist (SP) SAYING the national inquirer SAID oj is writting a book. no mention of the publisher by the way. Wonder who told her that oj is planning to keep the money? imo

martin II

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by martin II


tazzy hi

did fred write a book?
martin II

Hi Martin,

I know you have missed me.....:D

Okay, we all know that Fred wrote a book. Let me first say that it was a long time ago that he wrote it. But, Fred wasn't accused of murder. Fred lost someone that he loved and he has never "exploited" his son (like talked bad about him). His son was the victim of a crime. His son that he loved dearly was murdered.

OJ lost someone that he has said he loved very much. He had two children with her. One of them is still living with him. These two children lost their mother. Their whole world was turned upside down. Their father was accused of murdering their mother. Why would he joke or make light of the situation? Why would he trash their mother? They are a part of her also. And, OJ is not an angel. He has done the same things that he accuses her of doing. IMO It is in very, very bad taste to trash their mother. Ever. He needs to find a different way to make money. He already gets a monthly pay check that is way more than the average American makes.

IMO there is no way to justify this. IMO there is no way to make this acceptable.

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by 2L8 4A D8

Hi Tazzy! As long as there is a market for his cr@p and people are willing to support him in any way, shape or form and believe OJ is "100% Innocent," you will "understand how he can keep going with this." OJ doesn't care how he pays the bills. He will keep on "pimping: himself if it brings him a buck under the table!

JMO and MOO!!


Hi 2L8!!

I completely agree with you! It just makes me sick.

:cuss:

[ojisinnocent]

Some feedback from a notorious pro-J;

First, IF there is such a book coming, OJ did not realy write it. Just take a look at the original of his suicide note. That guy can't spell 'cat'. At most he dictated it. Could be he just signs off on it, and won't even read it, unless he goes on a book tour for it and has to answer questions about it.

Second, evrybody is overlook9ing something here.

OJ mentions aan accomplice. while OJ himself is now immune to prosecution ANY ACCOMPLICE HE HAD IS STILL SUBJECT TO CRIMINAL PROSECUTION. Moreover, OJ can be subpoenad to a grand jury and ordered to name the accomplice. since he is now immune, he can not refuse on 54th amendment grounds. If he refuses to name his accomplice, he can then be jailed for contempt.

For those reasons, I will now state m guess that this story is a red herring.

[martin II]

Originally posted by ojisinnocent
Some feedback from a notorious pro-J;

First, IF there is such a book coming, OJ did not realy write it. Just take a look at the original of his suicide note. That guy can't spell 'cat'. At most he dictated it. Could be he just signs off on it, and won't even read it, unless he goes on a book tour for it and has to answer questions about it.

Second, evrybody is overlook9ing something here.

OJ mentions aan accomplice. while OJ himself is now immune to prosecution ANY ACCOMPLICE HE HAD IS STILL SUBJECT TO CRIMINAL PROSECUTION. Moreover, OJ can be subpoenad to a grand jury and ordered to name the accomplice. since he is now immune, he can not refuse on 54th amendment grounds. If he refuses to name his accomplice, he can then be jailed for contempt.

For those reasons, I will now state m guess that this story is a red herring.

until a book is published and released, this is a story by a gossip
person. i did note that no referance to a piblisher etc was mentioned so that some confirmation could be made.

The article states that this 'BOOK' is a hypothetical story if there is a book, so to me this means that there is no actual REAL story.

If a accomplish , jim jones or mary cook is mentioned, it is still hypothetical.

lapd will never reopen this case. so it may all be a headline grabbing opportunity or a red herring imo

however it does show how some are quick to attack oj on some moral basis when there is not even a book out.
martin II

[fbgweezer]

*Snipped*Originally posted by tazzybaby
Okay, we all know that Fred wrote a book. What book did Fred write?

[martin II]

Originally posted by fbgweezer
*Snipped* What book did Fred write?

fbg

i don't know the title of freds book but a good title would have been " My son was murdered and i need some cash" imo
martin II

[2L8 4A D8]

Originally posted by martin II

fbg

i don't know the title of freds book but a good title would have been " My son was murdered and i need some cash" imo
martin II

How absolutely dispicable and sickening you are!! :flamemad: :cuss: :flamemad:

JMO and MOO!!

[goatgirl]

Wow!

I am shocked to hear that O.J wrote this book!

According to the National Enquirer the books publication is
only weeks away, so I guess we will hear more soon!

National Enquirer:
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrity/63698

GoatGirl
:)

[bobaugust]

Originally posted by goatgirl
Wow!

I am shocked to hear that O.J wrote this book!

According to the National Enquirer the books publication is
only weeks away, so I guess we will hear more soon!

National Enquirer:
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrity/63698

GoatGirl
:)


goatgirl, Simpson is a liar. I doubt if anything he says about the murders is real.

bobaugust

[2L8 4A D8]

Originally posted by goatgirl
Wow!

I am shocked to hear that O.J wrote this book!

According to the National Enquirer the books publication is
only weeks away, so I guess we will hear more soon!

National Enquirer:
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrity/63698

GoatGirl
:)

GG ~ OJ had to have had a Ghostwriter helping him. He's as illiterate as they come!

JMO and MOO!!

[martin II]

Originally posted by 2L8 4A D8


GG ~ OJ had to have had a Ghostwriter helping him. He's as illiterate as they come!

JMO and MOO!!

do you have a idea as to how a illiterate could build a fortune the size of what it is reported oj had?
martin II

[martin II]

Originally posted by bobaugust



goatgirl, Simpson is a liar. I doubt if anything he says about the murders is real.

bobaugust

bob

it would not be difficult to come up with a hypothetical using all of the transcript and theories in this case.

marti II

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by fbgweezer
*Snipped* What book did Fred write?


He and Kim wrote it. It was titled "His name was Ron". Ron's death was absolutely overshadowed by Nicole's death. They felt like people didn't care about Ron's death as much as Nicole's because of her being OJ's ex-wife.

Martin is just mad and trying everything to "take up" for OJ. Simpson has mocked the trial and the deaths at every turn. Simpson was one of the first to write a book. He wrote his first book while in jail.

Someone please :punch: Simpson.

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by goatgirl
Wow!

I am shocked to hear that O.J wrote this book!

According to the National Enquirer the books publication is
only weeks away, so I guess we will hear more soon!

National Enquirer:
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrity/63698

GoatGirl
:)

Hi Goargirl,

This is definately shocking! He never seems to stop.

:cuss:

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by martin II


do you have a idea as to how a illiterate could build a fortune the size of what it is reported oj had?
martin II

By running. He's really good at that.

:chicken:

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by martin II


bob

it would not be difficult to come up with a hypothetical using all of the transcript and theories in this case.

marti II

Hi Martin,

It wouldn't be hard for OJ. He knows all the secrets.

[fbgweezer]

Originally posted by martin II


fbg

i don't know the title of freds book but a good title would have been " My son was murdered and i need some cash" imo
martin II I hope that hateful remark makes you feel better. Seems you're made from the same character cloth as your hero -- the Butcher of Brentwood/orenthal james simpson.

[fbgweezer]

Originally posted by tazzybaby


Hi Martin,

It wouldn't be hard for OJ. He knows all the secrets. Now that made me laugh out loud! Thanks. :D

[fbgweezer]

*Snipped* Originally posted by tazzybaby
He and Kim wrote it. It was titled "His name was Ron". Ron's death was absolutely overshadowed by Nicole's death. Thanks -- I do remember it now.

[fbgweezer]

Originally posted by martin II


considering the number of books already written by PIMPS to make money off of oj, i guess he figures he is intitled to make a buck also imomartin II all he has to do now is make sure the NG's buy it 'cause ain't no self-respecting G going to. In fact, I bet it's on the internet within the week of it being published.

[martin II]

Originally posted by fbgweezer
all he has to do now is make sure the NG's buy it 'cause ain't no self-respecting G going to. In fact, I bet it's on the internet within the week of it being published.

fbg

the publisher of this book, IF THERE IS A BOOK, knows that people like you would love to read these'DETAILS' even if it is all a hypotical story as this would give you the opportunity to spin it as a authentic CONFESSION by oj.imo hahahahahahaha
martin II

[martin II]

Originally posted by tazzybaby


By running. He's really good at that.

:chicken:
taxxy hi
it takes more than running. ask anyone you know.
imo
martin II

[martin II]

Originally posted by tazzybaby



He and Kim wrote it. It was titled "His name was Ron". Ron's death was absolutely overshadowed by Nicole's death. They felt like people didn't care about Ron's death as much as Nicole's because of her being OJ's ex-wife.

Martin is just mad and trying everything to "take up" for OJ. Simpson has mocked the trial and the deaths at every turn. Simpson was one of the first to write a book. He wrote his first book while in jail.

Someone please :punch: Simpson.

tazzy hi
fred and oj ( and many others) wrote books for the same reasonS.
MONEY HONEY.
MARTIN ii

[martin II]

Originally posted by tazzybaby


Hi Martin,

It wouldn't be hard for OJ. He knows all the secrets.

TAZZY HI

Bob post here as if he knows all the secrets. even he could write a book on this case and i have often wondered why he has not. but then a publisher would have to critque the material.imo
martin II

[martin II]

Originally posted by martin II

taxxy hi
it takes more than running. ask anyone you know.
imo
martin II

tazzy hi

[fbgweezer]

Originally posted by martin II


fbg

the publisher of this book, IF THERE IS A BOOK, knows that people like you would love to read these'DETAILS' even if it is all a hypotical story as this would give you the opportunity to spin it as a authentic CONFESSION by oj.imo hahahahahahaha
martin II Monday, January 14 12:01 AM EST

OJ Simpson Unearths the Real Killers
By Wil Wheaton


New York - Early this morning, disgraced former football player and accused murderer OJ Simpson stood on a platform overlooking Ground Zero and announced, "I have finally found The Real Killers. It turns out that they were not, as I had previously thought, working on a golf course or at a strip club. It turns out that The Real Killers were working in the World Trade Center. Unfortunately, due to the tragic events of September 11, we will never be able to recover their bodies, or bring them to justice." -- ROFLMAO

[martin II]

Originally posted by fbgweezer
Monday, January 14 12:01 AM EST

OJ Simpson Unearths the Real Killers
By Wil Wheaton


New York - Early this morning, disgraced former football player and accused murderer OJ Simpson stood on a platform overlooking Ground Zero and announced, "I have finally found The Real Killers. It turns out that they were not, as I had previously thought, working on a golf course or at a strip club. It turns out that The Real Killers were working in the World Trade Center. Unfortunately, due to the tragic events of September 11, we will never be able to recover their bodies, or bring them to justice." -- ROFLMAO

maby the bodies they found yesterday at the WTC site were the bodies of the killers.imo
martin II

[fbgweezer]

Originally posted by martin II


maby the bodies they found yesterday at the WTC site were the bodies of the killers.imo
martin II what a freak!

[2L8 4A D8]

Originally posted by martin II

do you have a idea as to how a illiterate could build a fortune the size of what it is reported oj had?
martin II

Who ever said that you had to be a Rocket Scientist to be JUST a football player. That is OJ's only claim to fame. WOW! OJ sure didn't get his fortune from any academic allocades that's for sure! Duh!

JMO and MOO!!

[2L8 4A D8]

Originally posted by martin II

tazzy hi
fred and oj ( and many others) wrote books for the same reasonS.
MONEY HONEY.
MARTIN ii

Yes, they did, but you certainly didn't have any despicable and sickening title for OJ's book did you, such as: I Murdered My Ex-Wife and Her Friend Ron Goldman, But I Still Need Some Money!

:flamemad: You are nothing short of a POS and I am sick and tired of you trashing the victims and their families! :flamemad:

JMO and MOO!!

[martin II]

Originally posted by 2L8 4A D8


Yes, they did, but you certainly didn't have any despicable and sickening title for OJ's book did you, such as: I Murdered My Ex-Wife and Her Friend Ron Goldman, But I Still Need Some Money!

:flamemad: You are nothing short of a POS and I am sick and tired of you trashing the victims and their families! :flamemad:

JMO and MOO!!

so
martin II

[martin II]

Originally posted by 2L8 4A D8


Who ever said that you had to be a Rocket Scientist to be JUST a football player. That is OJ's only claim to fame. WOW! OJ sure didn't get his fortune from any academic allocades that's for sure! Duh!

JMO and MOO!!

2 l

oj never claimed to be a cone head academic, but he sure did exhibit some exceptional business savy to build a $10,000,000 fortune. which proves that one does not have to have great spelling skills to become rich.imo

martin II

[martin II]

Originally posted by 2L8 4A D8


Who ever said that you had to be a Rocket Scientist to be JUST a football player. That is OJ's only claim to fame. WOW! OJ sure didn't get his fortune from any academic allocades that's for sure! Duh!

JMO and MOO!!

[limakey]

Taz,

Everyday people make tons of money off death. Maybe not on the same scale as people who are involved in high profile cases, but lets be honest, how do those death photos get into the tabloids? Why did the tabloids publish that topless photograph of Nicole? Why did they publish the topless photo of Marcia Clark for that matter? Why did media trucks in Camp OJ have a copy of Johnnie Cochran's mother's death certificate pinned up in their truck?

Taz, I still can't figure out why it costs an average of $6,000.00 to bury someone. I believe just using the bulldozer to dig a grave is about $2,000.00 alone. Have no how much it costs to be cremated but just the thought of that gives me the willies.

A couple years ago, OJ gave an interview with a female reporter about, "if I did it". I think he also gave another interview using the words, "If I did it, it was because I loved her too much". However, no one focused on what he said afterward.

And every time someone has given him a way out to say that he did the murders and he just doesn't remember, he gives the "GMAB) look.

Taz, how much money do you think was made off of Princess Diana's death? Just think about the flowers, they weren't donated. Death and its aftermath is a business.

[martin II]

tazzy

It seems that the fact that oj receives over $300,000 retirement check as he plays golf just causes some to itch all over. oj took a lot of punishment for that retirement check and it has nothing to do with how much the average american's pay check is. Although he has been blackballed by most americas business from making a decent living at his trade, he still has the right to decide how to make money, ragardless of what some think about his methods.

i don't think he is interested in seeking approval from people that call him a murderer or what their opinions of him may be. imo
martin II

[TuscanDreams]

Originally posted by 2L8 4A D8
Who ever said that you had to be a Rocket Scientist to be JUST a football player. That is OJ's only claim to fame. WOW! OJ sure didn't get his fortune from any academic allocades that's for sure! Duh!

JMO and MOO!!

No joke- OJ chased a ball down a field for a living- people paid to watch. What a claim to fame. :rolleyes:

[goatgirl]

No Book !

according to Simpson's lawyer.....



O.J. Simpson's lawyer is denying The National Enquirer's claim that the disgraced gridiron star "confesses" in a new book to murdering ex-wife Nicole Simpson and her pal Ron Goldman — with an accomplice. The tab reports that Simpson is being paid $3.5 million to describe how he thinks the killings "might" have happened. But Simpson attorney Yale Galanter tells us Simpson "is not writing a book. We haven't been paid 35 cents, much less $3.5 million." Some suspect it may be an unauthorized book — written by a Simpson crony who's heard Simpson's rants about how the "real killers" would have done it. One insider heard that controversy-courting publisher Judith Regan at least considered the project. Regan's rep didn't return calls. But Galanter vows, "If anyone comes out with such a book, I'll go on every talk show and call it crap." Last week, a California state judge tentatively rejected the Goldman family's bid to seek the publicity rights to Simpson's name and image.


http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/464409p-390781c.html

GoatGirl

[martin II]

Originally posted by goatgirl
No Book !

according to Simpson's lawyer.....



O.J. Simpson's lawyer is denying The National Enquirer's claim that the disgraced gridiron star "confesses" in a new book to murdering ex-wife Nicole Simpson and her pal Ron Goldman — with an accomplice. The tab reports that Simpson is being paid $3.5 million to describe how he thinks the killings "might" have happened. But Simpson attorney Yale Galanter tells us Simpson "is not writing a book. We haven't been paid 35 cents, much less $3.5 million." Some suspect it may be an unauthorized book — written by a Simpson crony who's heard Simpson's rants about how the "real killers" would have done it. One insider heard that controversy-courting publisher Judith Regan at least considered the project. Regan's rep didn't return calls. But Galanter vows, "If anyone comes out with such a book, I'll go on every talk show and call it crap." Last week, a California state judge tentatively rejected the Goldman family's bid to seek the publicity rights to Simpson's name and image.


http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/464409p-390781c.html

GoatGirl

goat girl
so what do we do now if oj did not write a book. apologize for all the names he was called here? imo
martin II

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by martin II


goat girl
so what do we do now if oj did not write a book. apologize for all the names he was called here? imo
martin II

Hey Martin,

lol........Galanter is also the one who said that OJ did not make a "juiced" series. But, low and behold, we saw the out takes. I do not believe what Galanter has to say. He is an avid Simpson supporter who doesn't know what he's talking about.

I'm sure we'll find out what this is all about soon enough.

[martin II]

Originally posted by tazzybaby


Hey Martin,

lol........Galanter is also the one who said that OJ did not make a "juiced" series. But, low and behold, we saw the out takes. I do not believe what Galanter has to say. He is an avid Simpson supporter who doesn't know what he's talking about.

I'm sure we'll find out what this is all about soon enough.

tazzy
hi
corect me if i am wrong.
on that sex video, Oj was shown in a room fully dressed but the person shown in another room having sex in the video was a oj look alike. i saw the video and it did not look like oj to me. did you see the video?
martin II

[martin II]

Originally posted by tazzybaby


Hey Martin,

lol........Galanter is also the one who said that OJ did not make a "juiced" series. But, low and behold, we saw the out takes. I do not believe what Galanter has to say. He is an avid Simpson supporter who doesn't know what he's talking about.

I'm sure we'll find out what this is all about soon enough.

tazzy hi

if any book is published the publisher will be known. If someone puts oj's name on the book as the writer without his consent, them he may still get a big payday. imo

however if any book comes out regardless of who writes it, it will be interesting to see how many people will buy it.

martin II

[martin II]

Originally posted by tazzybaby


Hey Martin,

lol........Galanter is also the one who said that OJ did not make a "juiced" series. But, low and behold, we saw the out takes. I do not believe what Galanter has to say. He is an avid Simpson supporter who doesn't know what he's talking about.

I'm sure we'll find out what this is all about soon enough.

tazzy
i think Gallanter said oj was not having sex in any video.not that he was not in the bronco selling video
martin II

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by martin II


tazzy
hi
corect me if i am wrong.
on that sex video, Oj was shown in a room fully dressed but the person shown in another room having sex in the video was a oj look alike. i saw the video and it did not look like oj to me. did you see the video?
martin II

Hi Martin,

That's something different. I am talking about his poking fun at the bronco. He denied denied denied that he was doing it. Even though there were reports everywhere that he was.

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by martin II


tazzy hi

if any book is published the publisher will be known. If someone puts oj's name on the book as the writer without his consent, them he may still get a big payday. imo

however if any book comes out regardless of who writes it, it will be interesting to see how many people will buy it.

martin II

I doubt that OJ will ever get a "big payday". The only way to do that is to confess. He'll never do that. This book may be the closest that he comes.

Controversy is the only way to sell/make money off of anything OJ. So, controversy would help sell it for those who are "curious". But, taken seriously? Never.

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by limakey
Taz,

Everyday people make tons of money off death. Maybe not on the same scale as people who are involved in high profile cases, but lets be honest, how do those death photos get into the tabloids? Why did the tabloids publish that topless photograph of Nicole? Why did they publish the topless photo of Marcia Clark for that matter? Why did media trucks in Camp OJ have a copy of Johnnie Cochran's mother's death certificate pinned up in their truck?

Taz, I still can't figure out why it costs an average of $6,000.00 to bury someone. I believe just using the bulldozer to dig a grave is about $2,000.00 alone. Have no how much it costs to be cremated but just the thought of that gives me the willies.

A couple years ago, OJ gave an interview with a female reporter about, "if I did it". I think he also gave another interview using the words, "If I did it, it was because I loved her too much". However, no one focused on what he said afterward.

And every time someone has given him a way out to say that he did the murders and he just doesn't remember, he gives the "GMAB) look.

Taz, how much money do you think was made off of Princess Diana's death? Just think about the flowers, they weren't donated. Death and its aftermath is a business.

Hi Limakey,

I just saw this...I've been so busy (always).

You mention all of the people who have made money off of crimes/etc. This is on a scale all of it's own. Simpson has children with the victim. He is raising those children. He claimed to have really loved his ex-wife. He claims to love his children. He is the lowest of all lows to "make light" of the murder of his ex-wife in any way. That's completely different than just selling pictures. He actually poke's fun of using the bronco to "get away". He seems to keep trying to profit off of these murders.

He makes $25000.00 a month. Much more than most. I do NOT feel sorry for him in any way regarding money. He definately is not in dire needs so badly to need to "extort" the murders in any way. He should learn to budget a little better.

[martin II]

Originally posted by tazzybaby


Hi Limakey,

I just saw this...I've been so busy (always).

You mention all of the people who have made money off of crimes/etc. This is on a scale all of it's own. Simpson has children with the victim. He is raising those children. He claimed to have really loved his ex-wife. He claims to love his children. He is the lowest of all lows to "make light" of the murder of his ex-wife in any way. That's completely different than just selling pictures. He actually poke's fun of using the bronco to "get away". He seems to keep trying to profit off of these murders.

He makes $25000.00 a month. Much more than most. I do NOT feel sorry for him in any way regarding money. He definately is not in dire needs so badly to need to "extort" the murders in any way. He should learn to budget a little better.

tazzy hi
$25,000 may be a lot to some but not enough to others.
martin II

[martin II]

Originally posted by tazzybaby


I doubt that OJ will ever get a "big payday". The only way to do that is to confess. He'll never do that. This book may be the closest that he comes.

Controversy is the only way to sell/make money off of anything OJ. So, controversy would help sell it for those who are "curious". But, taken seriously? Never.

tazzy hi
i would not take a hopotical book serious either.
martin II

[fbgweezer]

Originally posted by martin II


tazzy hi
i would not take a hopotical book serious either.
martin II WTH

[goatgirl]

[QUOTE]Originally posted by martin II
[B]

goat girl
so what do we do now if oj did not write a book.

maybe there will still be a book, time will tell….

apologize for all the names he was called here? imo

I don’t think people should have to apologize for their opinions or feelings......

OJ Simpson brings out many emotions in people & no matter what he does or doesn’t do

there will always be some sort of reaction!

~~GoatGirl ~~
:rose:

[goatgirl]

Originally posted by martin II


tazzy hi
i would not take a hopotical book serious either.
martin II



LOL.....too funny

~~GoatGirl~~

[martin II]

Originally posted by goatgirl
[QUOTE]Originally posted by martin II
[B]

goat girl
so what do we do now if oj did not write a book.

maybe there will still be a book, time will tell….

apologize for all the names he was called here? imo

I don’t think people should have to apologize for their opinions or feelings......

OJ Simpson brings out many emotions in people & no matter what he does or doesn’t do

there will always be some sort of reaction!

~~GoatGirl ~~
:rose:

GOAT GIRL
I agree with you completely.

you and i could write a book using trial testimony, have it printed,
say oj was the ghost writer, sell it on the internet and many would argue that OJ CONFESSED in the book. imo
my point is that anger and hate can cloud one's reasoning.imo
martin II

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by martin II


GOAT GIRL
I agree with you completely.

you and i could write a book using trial testimony, have it printed,
say oj was the ghost writer, sell it on the internet and many would argue that OJ CONFESSED in the book. imo
my point is that anger and hate can cloud one's reasoning.imo
martin II

Hi Martin,

My anger and hate comes from his actions. And, it's not necessarily hate. It is disgust. And, that started when he started mocking the trial. He stated he would spend the rest of his life looking for the real killers (he really should have just said he hoped they would be found). He stated that he would never work so he didn't have to pay the judgement. He made the "juiced" tapes and mocked the whole bronco incident. If he did indeed write the portion or have anything to do with the portion in the book regarding "how he would have done it" then it just adds to the disgust. It won't change my opinion of him if he didn't have anything to do with the book. And, that's because of the "juiced" tapes.

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by goatgirl




LOL.....too funny

~~GoatGirl~~


LOL.....I know

:D

[martin II]

Originally posted by tazzybaby


Hi Martin,

My anger and hate comes from his actions. And, it's not necessarily hate. It is disgust. And, that started when he started mocking the trial. He stated he would spend the rest of his life looking for the real killers (he really should have just said he hoped they would be found). He stated that he would never work so he didn't have to pay the judgement. He made the "juiced" tapes and mocked the whole bronco incident. If he did indeed write the portion or have anything to do with the portion in the book regarding "how he would have done it" then it just adds to the disgust. It won't change my opinion of him if he didn't have anything to do with the book. And, that's because of the "juiced" tapes.

tazzy hi

Thats fair. i thought the juiced tapes were in bad taste also.
But i am now talking about this hypothetical book.
martin II

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by martin II


tazzy hi

Thats fair. i thought the juiced tapes were in bad taste also.
But i am now talking about this hypothetical book.
martin II


Yes, I know. That's why I stated that whether he had anything to do with it or not doesn't change my opinion of him. It would just add to the disgust if it does end up that he did have something to do with the book.

Simpson has created the opinion that I have of him now. It didn't start out that way.

[martin II]

Originally posted by tazzybaby



Yes, I know. That's why I stated that whether he had anything to do with it or not doesn't change my opinion of him. It would just add to the disgust if it does end up that he did have something to do with the book.

Simpson has created the opinion that I have of him now. It didn't start out that way.

tazzy hi
ok

On some level i would think that oj would be pissed that he is being treated negatively by some. Being black balled by the business comminity from working in his medium because they did not accept the not guilty verdict could cause a person to have the thought, well i will just stick it to them when i can. i am not oj so i don;t know what he thinks. But for sure he has no intentions of laying down or polishing someone auto for some cash.

martin II

[Americ@nBe@utyX]

Originally posted by tazzybaby
We have to discuss this! I cannot believe that he continues to try and profit off of his children's mothers murder. Whether you believe he did it or not, this is outrageous. I wonder if the Goldman's already knew about this and this is why they started a suit now?!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15066202/

They were just talking about this on the radio. They said that he goes into...."If I did it..." and he says that it was originally going to only be a threat. He says that there was an accomplice and that he grabbed the knife from him because he was over come with rage.


Simpson was a great football player. And, great football players are idolized. If he wanted to try and clean up his image then he should have used his football accomplishments and knowledge. Instead he chooses to exploit the murders. Nicole was not just an ex-girlfriend or just an ex-wife. She was the mother of his children. The children that he is suppose to look out for and have their best interests at heart. He is a joke this way. He cannot be taken seriously. I just don't understand how he can keep going with this.

:flamemad:

Hello Tazzy and everyone, nice to see you all again. I haven't heard about this, thanks for the heads up. I feel OJ is trying to get as much attention as possible. I wonder what lies he has now to write about now.:rolleyes:

[jotun]

Originally posted by tazzybaby


Hi Martin,

That's something different. I am talking about his poking fun at the bronco. He denied denied denied that he was doing it. Even though there were reports everywhere that he was.

Tazzy,
Think you are confused on the 'Juiced' video. Did you actually see it? Or just the media reports?
I saw it and alot of it was quite funny.The Bronco part was quite different than the media portrayed.Don't think O.J.ever denied doing 'JUICED'.There was a large magazine article about the making of,at the time,that I have.It was to be sold as a 6-part series years ago. Then later,in fact O.J. plugged it on his interviews in 04. But it wasn't seen until this year.

Think what he kinda "denied' was the old Pardo- O.J. TAPES that are in the news AGAIN now. Pardo was trying to sell them for tv as a 13 hour series. This was confused [as usual] by the media, and billed by them, as a 'reality show.' O.J. said he was not doing a 'reality show',tho he had been asked with him & the kids.And that he thought the O.J. TAPES would be BORING to watch on tv. Were just O.J. in airports, clubs, malls interviews etc.
jotun

[limakey]

Taz,

IMO, I think there comes a time in everyone's life when they finally realize that it doesn't matter what other people think about you, that it only matters what your family thinks and know.

I also believe that there comes in time in everyone's life when you just have to accept that no matter what you do or say or what comes out later, some people will never change their minds about you. In this case, if was proven that that OJ Simpson didn't commit the crimes, would that change anyone's mind on how he treated Nicole? Would his innocence in the murders absolve him from his other acts? I don't think so.

IMO, I think it is unfair to say greed and money are the only things behind someone writing a book about a case. I thought it was so unfair for the Browns and the Goldmans to be slammed on this issue. While I totally disagree with both family members posing at their loved one's gravesite, I don't think they did it for exposure or for the money.

I think some of the things Simpson has done since the trial was in bad taste, however, it doesn't compare to the "Dancing Itos" and some of the other things people have done and said about this case to make money.

I have never been in this situation, but I will tell you, that I worry about how I will send my son to college, and if I had to sell myself a thousand times a night, I would do it for the money. However, I don't think unemployment and social security will help out here!

No matter what you think of him, he has two "minor" children, one in college and one wanting to go college. It is a assumed that he wants this money just for himself, but is that fair if that money is going to his children? Should Sydney and Justin pay for the sins of their father even more then you think they already have?

It is also assumed, if he wrote this book that it was his idea, but maybe it wasn't? There could be others that are telling him to write a book.

IMO.

[Wukong]

Originally posted by Americ@nBe@utyX


Hello Tazzy and everyone, nice to see you all again. I haven't heard about this, thanks for the heads up. I feel OJ is trying to get as much attention as possible. I wonder what lies he has now to write about now.:rolleyes:

Hey ABX,

Long time no see. Did you ever get back to N.O.? Hope all is well with you. I have a bone to pick with you; I saw you on Kato's Myspace and went to your site and requested to be your friend. I was not accepted and I feel very dejected and hurt. But I am sure if you knew it was me you would have welcomed me with open arms! Maybe it was my pic? I was having a bad hair day and looked a lot like a James Brown mug shot :)

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by jotun


Tazzy,
Think you are confused on the 'Juiced' video. Did you actually see it? Or just the media reports?
I saw it and alot of it was quite funny.The Bronco part was quite different than the media portrayed.Don't think O.J.ever denied doing 'JUICED'.There was a large magazine article about the making of,at the time,that I have.It was to be sold as a 6-part series years ago. Then later,in fact O.J. plugged it on his interviews in 04. But it wasn't seen until this year.

Think what he kinda "denied' was the old Pardo- O.J. TAPES that are in the news AGAIN now. Pardo was trying to sell them for tv as a 13 hour series. This was confused [as usual] by the media, and billed by them, as a 'reality show.' O.J. said he was not doing a 'reality show',tho he had been asked with him & the kids.And that he thought the O.J. TAPES would be BORING to watch on tv. Were just O.J. in airports, clubs, malls interviews etc.
jotun

Hi Jotun,

Yes, I saw it. The Bronco part was in very, very bad taste.

Yes, he denied doing a "reality" show. "Juiced" would be considered a "reality" show. Even though it was years ago and blah, blah, blah. His lawyer was there with him denying it also. And, I know that later he actually "promoted" it. Of course, denying that he was ever paid a penny.

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by Americ@nBe@utyX


Hello Tazzy and everyone, nice to see you all again. I haven't heard about this, thanks for the heads up. I feel OJ is trying to get as much attention as possible. I wonder what lies he has now to write about now.:rolleyes:

Hi ABX!!

We have missed you!! So glad to see you posting!!

:seeya:

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by limakey
Taz,

*snip*
I think some of the things Simpson has done since the trial was in bad taste, however, it doesn't compare to the "Dancing Itos" and some of the other things people have done and said about this case to make money.

I have never been in this situation, but I will tell you, that I worry about how I will send my son to college, and if I had to sell myself a thousand times a night, I would do it for the money. However, I don't think unemployment and social security will help out here!

No matter what you think of him, he has two "minor" children, one in college and one wanting to go college. It is a assumed that he wants this money just for himself, but is that fair if that money is going to his children? Should Sydney and Justin pay for the sins of their father even more then you think they already have?

It is also assumed, if he wrote this book that it was his idea, but maybe it wasn't? There could be others that are telling him to write a book.

IMO.

Hi Limakey,

Doesn't compare to the "dancing ito's"???? I can't believe you would even make that comparison. There is NOTHING that can compare with OJ making "light" of the murder of his children's mother. I definately don't forget that he has "minor" children. It seems he does. He has children that have to live the rest of their lives without their mother. And, he wants to laugh about it on "juiced"? There is nothing that can come close to being so low as he himself making fun of/laughing/getting a laugh in regards to anything to do with the murder of his children's mother. Nothing.

He makes plenty to send his children to college. There are many, many people who pay their own way through college. There are many, many people who make much less and still send their children to college. That is no excuse.

We won't know for sure about this book until it comes out. I am interested to find out.

[Kate Sachel]

Originally posted by limakey

IMO, I think it is unfair to say greed and money are the only things behind someone writing a book about a case. I thought it was so unfair for the Browns and the Goldmans to be slammed on this issue. While I totally disagree with both family members posing at their loved one's gravesite, I don't think they did it for exposure or for the money.

It is also assumed, if he wrote this book that it was his idea, but maybe it wasn't? There could be others that are telling him to write a book.

IMO.

Agreed as far as your point that greed and money are not the only thing behind someone deciding to write a book.

However, I'm not sure it matters whose idea the book was (if there is in fact a book) because I am assuming that he does a mind to think with, and that he is aware of what the word "no" means.

Kate

[martin II]

Tazzy hi

IF there is a book, do you think it will make the top ten N.Y. Times list.

martin II

[limakey]

Taz,

None of us, at least I think none of us have been a defendant in a murder trial. As far as I know, none of us are in the "rich and famous" tax bracket either.

I don't know how much my outlook on life would change, but I do know it would change. I also think that as much as my outlook would change, the degrees of it would be based only children's opinon of me.

While I truly believe some of the stuff that he has done is in bad taste, but IMO, anyone in his position has the right to deal with it they they need to get through it.

However, the "Dancing Itos", were done purely for sport and the revenue of the network. Not all the jokes that were told were at OJ's expense. No one in the Simpson family or the Goldman family was spared from the greed of certain members of the media. While so many of the media has made comments about OJ Simpson owing the Goldmans' so much money, (note, the Browns don't get the same treatment) and how hard it has been on them---well if it wasn't for OJ Simpson, where would they be in their careers? There a quite of few journalists who are now millionaires just off the death of Ron and Nicole.

[limakey]

Kate,

I believe it was Prince William who gave Diana the idea to auction off her clothes for charity.

I remember when the Kennedy children auctioned off some of their parents' stuff. I remember several celebrities coming and out and saying that it if their kids, they kill 'em!

I don't think he would ever write book and confess, but I do believe that he would write a book where he was trying to prove he could not have done this, that one man could not have done this.

As you know, there has been much discussion on what Sydney and Justin know---and not just about that night. They saw their mother change, they may have known that their mother was afraid of someone or something but it wasn't their father.

Another thing to consider, is that Justin Simpson will be 18 a year or two---remember how the journalists were just licking their chops, drooling over the thought of Justin turning 18 and both he and his sister file a civil suit against him? Maybe this is the kids' way of flipping off all those journalists who had nothing but lust in their eyes when they thought of them suing their father.

[Kate Sachel]

Originally posted by limakey
Kate,

I believe it was Prince William who gave Diana the idea to auction off her clothes for charity.

I remember when the Kennedy children auctioned off some of their parents' stuff. I remember several celebrities coming and out and saying that it if their kids, they kill 'em!

I don't think he would ever write book and confess, but I do believe that he would write a book where he was trying to prove he could not have done this, that one man could not have done this.

As you know, there has been much discussion on what Sydney and Justin know---and not just about that night. They saw their mother change, they may have known that their mother was afraid of someone or something but it wasn't their father.

Another thing to consider, is that Justin Simpson will be 18 a year or two---remember how the journalists were just licking their chops, drooling over the thought of Justin turning 18 and both he and his sister file a civil suit against him? Maybe this is the kids' way of flipping off all those journalists who had nothing but lust in their eyes when they thought of them suing their father.

I don't believe that Sydney or Justin know much, if anything at all, about June 12, 1994. I also don't believe that Justin knows much about the details of his parent's relationship because he was too young and I believe they tried to shield him from most things.

However, I believe that Sydney knows much about her parent's relationship and it appears from several diary entires written by Nicole that Sydney witnessed alot of screaming toward her mother by her father and I do believe that is why she strongly appears to dislike him in her adulthood.

Even those closest to him have held firm that while he could be very generous with his money, the bottom line is that OJ Simpson has always been about OJ Simpson. Let's look at his history, for example, with all of his children. In his first marriage, Marguerite wrote a letter complaining of OJ's neglect toward the children. In his second marriage, Nicole complained of the same thing.

In his deposition for the civil trial, Jason Simpson admitted that he had formed a "suspicion" that his father was connected to Nicole's murder. For those who think that Jason may have committed the murders this is probably no big deal. To me, it speaks volumes.

Kate

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by Kate Sachel
*snip*

In his deposition for the civil trial, Jason Simpson admitted that he had formed a "suspicion" that his father was connected to Nicole's murder. For those who think that Jason may have committed the murders this is probably no big deal. To me, it speaks volumes.

Kate

Good to see you Kate :seeya:

I agree with you, it must have been very difficult for Jason to come to this "suspicion". It would be the last thing you would want to think of your Dad, let alone voice that in a depo. imo

[goatgirl]

If Oj Simpson isnt writting this book....

then I wonder why he doesnt "sue" the pants off the National Enquirer for planting a false story.

~~GoatGirl~~

:)

[martin II]

Originally posted by goatgirl
If Oj Simpson isnt writting this book....

then I wonder why he doesnt "sue" the pants off the National Enquirer for planting a false story.

~~GoatGirl~~

:)

goatgirl

if he is not writing the book. he may do that.

martin II

[goatgirl]

Originally posted by martin II


goatgirl

if he is not writing the book. he may do that.

martin II

:beer: I guess time will tell huh!

~~Goatgirl~~

[jotun]

All:
This just in:
http://www.variety.com/
article/VR1117953915.
html?categoryid=14&cs=1

jotun

[goatgirl]

Originally posted by jotun
All:
This just in:
http://www.variety.com/
article/VR1117953915.
html?categoryid=14&cs=1

jotun




Wow ...crazy stuff !!!

I will have to tune in forsure!

~~GoatGirl~~

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by goatgirl

Wow ...crazy stuff !!!

I will have to tune in forsure!

~~GoatGirl~~

Yep, I'm sure he'll make a fool of himself again! :tongue:

[martin II]

Originally posted by goatgirl





Wow ...crazy stuff !!!

I will have to tune in forsure!

~~GoatGirl~~

Goat girl

well here we go again. :)

"if i did it" will be interpreted by many as a confession by oj regardless of what is in the interview/ book so i don't know how oj will benefit unless he is being paid in some way.

martin II

[Postergeist]

was interviewed earlier this morning on one of the broadcast network news stations (forget which one) where he talks about OJ's new book and how OJ's mentions the mythological story with an accomplice by the name of "Charlie" that "gave" OJ the knife.

jmo

[Kate Sachel]

Originally posted by martin II


Goat girl

well here we go again. :)

"if i did it" will be interpreted by many as a confession by oj regardless of what is in the interview/ book so i don't know how oj will benefit unless he is being paid in some way.

martin II

3 million is the reported dollar amount he will allegedly be recieving for penning the book. I would assume that they he is getting paid for the interview as well.

Either way, I find it disgusting to give an interview and write a book about how you would murder your ex-wife after your ex-wife has indeed been murdered.

Glad to see he cares enough for his children to stay out of the limelight in regard to this particular topic:rolleyes:

Kate

[barskin&co.]

UPDATE!! The Fox special will now be entitled "OJ: If I Did It, I Beat The Rap, And You Can Just Kiss My You Know What, And, By The Way, Take That, Fred Goldman, You're Not Gonna See One Red Cent."
Catchy, don't you think?

[Americ@nBe@utyX]

I think he is the devil incarnate.

[Postergeist]

just mentioned on the View (airing right now) that she was asked to do the interview with OJ and she turned it down.

They are discussing the upcoming Fox airing of the interview with OJ (and Rosie said he's a murderer and said the woman doing the interview has no ethics, lol)

http://abc.go.com/daytime/theview/

[iluvbubba]

Originally posted by Postergeist
just mentioned on the View (airing right now) that she was asked to do the interview with OJ and she turned it down.

They are discussing the upcoming Fox airing of the interview with OJ (and Rosie said he's a murderer and said the woman doing the interview has no ethics, lol)

http://abc.go.com/daytime/theview/

Amen to that. I'm glad BW turned down that interview. Who in their right mind would want to give this piece of dirt any air time?

I was just discussing it this morning with someone - even if he was innocent (and I'm 100% sure he's not) WHY would you do something so sick? You have children with this woman! To revisit her murder and put your spin on how you would have done it is just reprehensible.

I think OJ is proud of the fact that he got away with a double murder, his name isn't in the news much these days (before this) so he misses the attention, and he's also saying "eat this" because he cannot be tried again for the same crime. This book - in my opinion - is his confession.

[weepy willa]

Does O.J. think this book will SLASH its way to the top of the Best Seller's list?

[bandit's mom]

Originally posted by weepy willa
Does O.J. think this book will SLASH its way to the top of the Best Seller's list?

I was just curious the response to this news. This man is a piece
of work. I wonder if he'll tell the truth about how he did it,
or make up some scenario of how he wishes he'd done it.
After all, he's had 12 years to think back on his mistakes and
how he could have done things differently, and considering what
a liar he is, I still doubt that this will be the whole truth.

At any rate, I wouldn't watch this program or buy the book for
anything. My heart goes out to the Goldmans, the Browns and
those poor children. "Merry Christmas kids, I'm going to tell
the world how I killed Mommy".

[Mashey46]

Originally posted by Americ@nBe@utyX
I think he is the devil incarnate.

He escaped being charged with the d/p...

Acquitted

Hasn't paid the victim's a penny...

either the above...or....he's under protection from above....:confused:

[martin II]

Originally posted by weepy willa
Does O.J. think this book will SLASH its way to the top of the Best Seller's list?

I bet the publisher hopes it will.
martin II

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by martin II
*snip*

"if i did it" will be interpreted by many as a confession by oj regardless of what is in the interview/ book so i don't know how oj will benefit unless he is being paid in some way.

martin II

It's been stated several times that he got a hefty advance. Can't you read??? Of course if he comes right out & admits it, you will spin it & not believe it. IMO

[sassylassy]

Originally posted by martin II


I bet the publisher hopes it will.
martin II

That's For-sure

[tmay]

At best, incredibly tacky and without class. Showing no empathy(like Peterson the murderer) what's that called a sociopath?

empathy: The imaginative projection into another's feelings, a state of total identification with another's situation, condition, and thoughts. The action of understanding, being aware of, being sensitive to, and vicariously experiencing the feelings, thoughts, and experience of another of either the past or present without explicitly articulating these feelings.

Open mouth insert foot Simpson. He will trip himself up eventually. I've read before how sometimes a crime would have remained unsolved but the guilty party won't stop talking about it, they end up making mistakes...


He is just disgusting.

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by tmay
*snip*
At best, incredibly tacky and without class. Showing no empathy(like Peterson the murderer) what's that called a sociopath?


Yes, from what I know about him, I think Simpson is a sociopath.

[LushLife]

Originally posted by martin II
Tazzy hi

IF there is a book, do you think it will make the top ten N.Y. Times list.

martin II

I think it will end up in the $1.00 bin like Paula Barbiari's.

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by LushLife


I think it will end up in the $1.00 bin like Paula Barbiari's.

:beer: and his other loser book "I want to tell you" :biggrin:

[sassylassy]

Originally posted by LushLife


I think it will end up in the $1.00 bin like Paula Barbiari's.

Ha! I am gonna save myself some cash & get it then.

[martin II]

Originally posted by LushLife


I think it will end up in the $1.00 bin like Paula Barbiari's.

lushlife

Thats funny and i agree. Thats what make me wonder if oj is being paid $3.5 mil for a book that may not last a week.imo

ps i like you nic. i am sure you know it is the name of a famous jazz song.
martin II

[sassylassy]

Originally posted by socaldiva


:beer: and his other loser book "I want to tell you" :biggrin:

it did have nice photo's :shrug:

[rem16]

http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/TV/11/15/simpsoninterview.ap/index.html


Well the publisher does think this is OJ's confession..

[SlipperySlope]

Originally posted by martin II
tazzy

It seems that the fact that oj receives over $300,000 retirement check as he plays golf just causes some to itch all over. oj took a lot of punishment for that retirement check and it has nothing to do with how much the average american's pay check is. Although he has been blackballed by most americas business from making a decent living at his trade, he still has the right to decide how to make money, ragardless of what some think about his methods.

i don't think he is interested in seeking approval from people that call him a murderer or what their opinions of him may be. imo
martin II

Nope, he's happy as a pig in slop to sell his useless book to any fool who's stupid enough to waste their hard earned money to buy it.

It's just OJ being OJ!!! An amerikan hero in some eyes...right mII?

:tongue:

[sassylassy]

Originally posted by rem16
http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/TV/11/15/simpsoninterview.ap/index.html


Well the publisher does think this is OJ's confession..

The publisher wants this book to sell.

they have a hand in the pie. so this is just media hype to sell the book.

[SlipperySlope]

Originally posted by martin II


Goat girl

well here we go again. :)

"if i did it" will be interpreted by many as a confession by oj regardless of what is in the interview/ book so i don't know how oj will benefit unless he is being paid in some way.

martin II

mII,

Maybe it's OJ's brilliant plan to get the "real killers" to come out of hiding!!

Ya thimk?

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by SlipperySlope


mII,

Maybe it's OJ's brilliant plan to get the "real killers" to come out of hiding!!

Ya thimk?

Yeah, then they can argue back & forth "I did it", no "I did it". :tongue:

[SlipperySlope]

Originally posted by barskin&amp;co.
UPDATE!! The Fox special will now be entitled "OJ: If I Did It, I Beat The Rap, And You Can Just Kiss My You Know What, And, By The Way, Take That, Fred Goldman, You're Not Gonna See One Red Cent."
Catchy, don't you think?

How 'bout we shrink the title down to "My Life"

Already taken? OK, "My Lie"

:biggrin:

[SlipperySlope]

Originally posted by martin II


I bet the publisher hopes it will.
martin II

mII - you're such a cut-up...you're OJ-esque!!!

:hat:

[SlipperySlope]

Originally posted by LushLife


I think it will end up in the $1.00 bin like Paula Barbiari's.

...or lining a bevy of bird cages!

[martin II]

Originally posted by SlipperySlope


mII,

Maybe it's OJ's brilliant plan to get the "real killers" to come out of hiding!!

Ya thimk?

naw

But it may be a good plan for making trips to Switzerland. imo
martin II

[SlipperySlope]

Originally posted by martin II


2 l

oj never claimed to be a cone head academic, but he sure did exhibit some exceptional business savy to build a $10,000,000 fortune. which proves that one does not have to have great spelling skills to become rich.imo

martin II

..and I'm sure OJ's legacy will be that he had enough "business savy" to build a $10,000,000 fortune. What an inspiration!!!

Could be the subject of his NEXT book...
:confused:

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by martin II
*snip*
But it may be a good plan for making trips to Switzerland. imo
martin II

Good. I hope it's a one way trip :tongue:

[rem16]

I would think that buying that book and putting even a dime in the pocket of OJ Simpson will preclude sane people from doing it. If Fred Goldman would be getting some of the money that is one thing, but I doubt he will. Oj will find some way to hide it. :rolleyes:

[martin II]

Originally posted by SlipperySlope


How 'bout we shrink the title down to "My Life"

Already taken? OK, "My Lie"

:biggrin:

or
"someone left $3.5 mil on my door step."
martin II

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by SlipperySlope

..and I'm sure OJ's legacy will be that he had enough "business savy" to build a $10,000,000 fortune. What an inspiration!!!

Could be the subject of his NEXT book...
:confused:

Gawd....Simpson is as dumb as can be. His "fortune" was built by business managers. The dude can't even write an entire sentence that makes sense. imo

[SlipperySlope]

Originally posted by martin II


naw

But it may be a good plan for making trips to Switzerland. imo
martin II

What a wit! Martin I must be so proud!!!!!
:beer:

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by SlipperySlope


What a wit! Martin I must be so proud!!!!!
:beer:

:lol: :lol:

[SlipperySlope]

Originally posted by socaldiva


Gawd....Simpson is as dumb as can be. His "fortune" was built by business managers. The dude can't even write an entire sentence that makes sense. imo

...then an entire book would be a literary flop? Then who in their right minds would buy it?

:read:

[martin II]

Originally posted by SlipperySlope


..and I'm sure OJ's legacy will be that he had enough "business savy" to build a $10,000,000 fortune. What an inspiration!!!

Could be the subject of his NEXT book...
:confused:

could be.. but many Americans work daily trying to get as close to that number as they can. imo
martin II

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by martin II


could be.. but many Americans work daily trying to get as close to that number as they can. imo
martin II

Nah, most people try to live honorably & don't sell their souls for money.

[SlipperySlope]

Originally posted by socaldiva


Good. I hope it's a one way trip :tongue:

Maybe he can get teddy Kennedy to drive him there!!!
:D

[SlipperySlope]

Originally posted by martin II


could be.. but many Americans work daily trying to get as close to that number as they can. imo
martin II

...unlike yourself, of course!
:cool:

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by SlipperySlope


Maybe he can get teddy Kennedy to drive him there!!!
:D

I'll buy the gas :biggrin:

[SlipperySlope]

Originally posted by socaldiva


Nah, most people try to live honorably & don't sell their souls for money.

That's a BIG Amen, sista!!!
:beer:

[martin II]

Originally posted by SlipperySlope


...then an entire book would be a literary flop? Then who in their right minds would buy it?

:read:

slip

That is the question.

Maby the publisher is the dummy of the industry or he knows something that we don't know. What do you think?
martin II

[martin II]

Originally posted by SlipperySlope


Maybe he can get teddy Kennedy to drive him there!!!
:D

little to much water don't you think?
martin II

[SlipperySlope]

Originally posted by socaldiva


I'll buy the gas :biggrin:

And mII's giving me gas...I'm off to the gym.

Keep mII in line socaldiva!!! You're doing great.....I think he's punch drunk!! (you can tell by the semi-concious nature of his responses)

;)

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by SlipperySlope
[B]*snip*
And mII's giving me gas...I'm off to the gym.



:D I hope you come back :seeya:

[SlipperySlope]

Originally posted by martin II


little to much water don't you think?
martin II

Water volume has never been a problem for 'ol Teddy, if memory serves me!!

:patriot:

[SlipperySlope]

Originally posted by socaldiva


:D I hope you come back :seeya:

As a reverred old General once said: "I shall return.

:patriot:

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by SlipperySlope


As a reverred old General once said: "I shall return.

:patriot:

kewl :cool:

[martin II]

Originally posted by SlipperySlope


And mII's giving me gas...I'm off to the gym.

Keep mII in line socaldiva!!! You're doing great.....I think he's punch drunk!! (you can tell by the semi-concious nature of his responses)

;)

naw

you may have brought it with you or it could be a normal occurance for you. i don't know. But i hope you get rid of it, wouldn't want to hear that you have floated away.imo
martin II

[SlapHappyGirl2]

IMO, the book and interview are tacky, tasteless, and dispicable. What a crude way to make money.

[martin II]

Originally posted by SlapHappyGirl2
IMO, the book and interview are tacky, tasteless, and dispicable. What a crude way to make money.

Judith Regan seems to be offering some excuses/reasons for her participation in this project.



Regan further described herself as a victim when she said the media "have all but called for my death for publishing his book and for interviewing him," something she called a double standard.

Regan continued, "A death, I might add, not called for when Katie Couric interviewed him; not called for when Barbara Walters had an exclusive with the Menendez brothers, who killed their parents in cold blood . . . not called for when '60 Minutes' interviewed Timothy McVeigh, who murdered hundreds in Oklahoma City."

She characterized the Simpson trial, for better or worse, as "a seminal moment in American history," as it was a perfect tabloid mystery double murder, with its crosscurrents of violence, celebrity, racism, wealth, police corruption and the media.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/17/AR2006111700533.html


martin II

[Kate Sachel]

Judith Regan was a victim of domestic violence, and has a deep sympathy for Nicole Brown.


In her statement, she reveals that she knew the trial verdict would be "not guilty" and that she was outraged and remains so today. She considers this book to be his confession, and his apology. She refers to him as the "killer" and claims that his interivew with him shows him to be a mentally sick individual who has not alot of remorse.

I am curious why, knowing all of this, OJ Simpson would choose to deal with her.

Kate

[fbgweezer]

*Snipped*Originally posted by Kate Sachel
I am curious why, knowing all of this, OJ Simpson would choose to deal with her. I think you can chalk it up to the fact that he displays the personality of a sociopath and there is, of course, no doubt that he suffers narcissism.

I've seen some of the 'teasers' for the interview and can't help but think about the friends and family who testified that orenthal loved/loves to talk. And of course, Nicole wrote in her diary/letter/police report (I actually don't remember which one) about how during their argument, he kept calling her and when she quit answering his calls, he came to the house.

[martin II]

All

here is her sons father commenting on Ms Regan comments about him.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/11182006/news/nationalnews/ex_slaps_back_at_o_j__book_pusher_nationalnews_jen nifer_fermino.htm

November 18, 2006 -- The allegedly abusive ex-lover Judith Regan insists inspired her to publish O.J. Simpson's "confession" denied the shocking claims yesterday - saying he was insulted she'd use their relationship to hawk books.

"I feel victimized that she uses this as a way to make her living," said disgraced psychiatrist David Buckley, who seriously dated Regan in the '80s and is her grown son's father.

martin II

[martin II]

Originally posted by martin II
All

here is her sons father commenting on Ms Regan comments about him.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/11182006/news/nationalnews/ex_slaps_back_at_o_j__book_pusher_nationalnews_jen nifer_fermino.htm

November 18, 2006 -- The allegedly abusive ex-lover Judith Regan insists inspired her to publish O.J. Simpson's "confession" denied the shocking claims yesterday - saying he was insulted she'd use their relationship to hawk books.

"I feel victimized that she uses this as a way to make her living," said disgraced psychiatrist David Buckley, who seriously dated Regan in the '80s and is her grown son's father.

martin II

link to post story

http://www.nypost.com/seven/11182006/news/nationalnews/ex_slaps_back_at_o_j__book_pusher_nationalnews_jen nifer_fermino.htm

[martin II]

the link to the n.y. post does not seem to work.

n.y. post sunday Nov 18th


ABUSE STORY 'FICTION'

JUICE-Y DETAILS: David Buckley accuses publisher Judith Regan (above) of inventing a domestic abuse tale to sell a loathsome book by O.J. Simpson.

November 18, 2006 -- The allegedly abusive ex-lover Judith Regan insists inspired her to publish O.J. Simpson's "confession" denied the shocking claims yesterday - saying he was insulted she'd use their relationship to hawk books.

I feel victimized that she uses this as a way to make her living," said disgraced psychiatrist David Buckley, who seriously dated Regan in the '80s and is her grown son's father.

"Judy has these ideas - let's rule the world according to Judith Regan's whims. Now she's selling books at my expense. It's untrue!"

"It's an entirely circumstantial story created to sell books," said Buckley.

And particularly disturbing, he added, it's "to sell books by someone who killed two people."

He described their courtship as "tumultuous, passionate [and] ruthless."

"It was a dysfunctional relationship that cut both ways," he said. "She was never beaten up, she was beaten back."

Still, he contends that his physical aggression toward the brash, famously foulmouthed literary dynamo was "nothing more than playground tussles."

"She was not a beaten woman. If she got into a fight and had some scratches, it was because she attacked me. I never attacked her. She beat me up."

Regan has said she agreed to publish O.J.'s "hypothetical" book on how he killed his wife, titled "If I Did It," so that "the men who broke my heart [would] tell the truth."

"Like Nicole Brown, I believed with all my heart . . . and then got punched in the face. Literally," Regan wrote in a rambling statement released Thursday.

She alleges that she suffered for years at the hands of her son's father - a once "tall, dark and handsome" doctor who was so charming that no one believed her claims.

The abuse was so bad, she said, she was hospitalized once from "a blow to the head."

Buckley said he and Regan were actually friends for years after their split in the early '80s - and even bunked in a spare bedroom during trips to New York to see his son.

view full article >page 1 2 continue reading >
\
martin II

[martin II]

balance of story.


November 18, 2006 -- CONTINUED

"I was always an invited guest for years when I'd come to New York," he said. That all ended when, "Judy rose to this position where she could use her sob story. She might even believe it now, she hears it so much."

Buckley - who served time for marijuana smuggling and lost his medical license - also claims Regan profited from his illegal activities.

"I was one of the kingpins going in, and she was one of the investors," he said. "I took the fall. Her money's been tainted ever since."

He also took issue with her characterization of him as a deadbeat dad to their son, Patrick Buckley, who's now 25.

"I was as much of a father as it was humanly possible to be in the circumstances," he said.

A spokeswoman for Regan said, "[She] stands behind her statement."

Regan had made the statement in response to a barrage of criticism stemming from the Simpson tell-all.

In the book, the former gridiron great writes a supposedly fictional account of the murder of his wife and her friend, Ron Goldman.

The news of the book - which will be released at the end of the month - infuriated the victims' families.

And their wrath was not aimed only at Simpson. They blasted Regan for both publishing the book and conducting an interview that will air on Fox News the end of November.

The interview features a blubbering Simpson giving "hypothetical" details about the double murder.

"I can't do this, I can't have my kids hear me say this," a tearful Simpson says at one point.

Of the on-air breakdown, Regan said, "I consider it his confession."

Simpson's lawyer, however, does not.

"[Regan's] entitled to her opinion, but she's wrong," said Yale Galanter. "This is the furthest thing from a confession."

He said there is one chapter in the book about the murders, for which Simpson was acquitted in 1995.

"In that chapter, it says it's a hypothetical situation and it's fiction," he said.


jennifer.fermino@nypost.com

martin II

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by martin II
*snip*
Still, he contends that his physical aggression toward the brash, famously foulmouthed literary dynamo was "nothing more than playground tussles."

"She was not a beaten woman. If she got into a fight and had some scratches, it was because she attacked me. I never attacked her. She beat me up."



Regan's ex sounds like OJ's twin, except OJ called it "rassling" :rolleyes:

[Kate Sachel]

Originally posted by martin II
All

here is her sons father commenting on Ms Regan comments about him.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/11182006/news/nationalnews/ex_slaps_back_at_o_j__book_pusher_nationalnews_jen nifer_fermino.htm

November 18, 2006 -- The allegedly abusive ex-lover Judith Regan insists inspired her to publish O.J. Simpson's "confession" denied the shocking claims yesterday - saying he was insulted she'd use their relationship to hawk books.

"I feel victimized that she uses this as a way to make her living," said disgraced psychiatrist David Buckley, who seriously dated Regan in the '80s and is her grown son's father.

martin II

Please, I beg of you for one moment to realize that of course the man who abused her is going to deny the abuse. He's a psychiatrist for God's sake, what do you think admitting to smacking his girlfriend around would do to his career?

I can save you a little time and answer for you ... it would ruin it.


Kate

[Kate Sachel]

Originally posted by socaldiva


Regan's ex sounds like OJ's twin, except OJ called it "rassling" :rolleyes:

Perhaps he's the one that should have conducted the interview with OJ.

Kate

[fbgweezer]

*Snipped*Originally posted by martin II
ruthless."

"It was a dysfunctional relationship that cut both ways," he said. "She was never beaten up, she was beaten back."

Still, he contends that his physical aggression toward the brash, famously foulmouthed literary dynamo was "nothing more than playground tussles."

"She was not a beaten woman. If she got into a fight and had some scratches, it was because she attacked me. I never attacked her. She beat me up." Oh my -- I didn't even see orenthal lips move. What a slime! I guess that's how abusers excuse their behavior -- "She made me do it."

[fbgweezer]

Originally posted by Kate Sachel


Perhaps he's the one that should have conducted the interview with OJ.

Kate They could have sat around talked 'technique' -- geez!:flamemad:

[Americ@nBe@utyX]

www.dontpayoj.com

I signed the petition.

[fbgweezer]

*Snipped*Originally posted by martin II
Simpson's lawyer, however, does not.

"[Regan's] entitled to her opinion, but she's wrong," said Yale Galanter. "This is the furthest thing from a confession."

He said there is one chapter in the book about the murders, for which Simpson was acquitted in 1995.

"In that chapter, it says it's a hypothetical situation and it's fiction," he said. Hmmm -- what happened to "There isn't any book and I'll go on the talk shows and call it crap. . . " LOL . . .we're waiting Mr. Lawyer.

[fbgweezer]

Originally posted by Americ@nBe@utyX
www.dontpayoj.com

I signed the petition. Me too!

[Americ@nBe@utyX]

Originally posted by fbgweezer
Me too!

Bless you, thank you. I'm going to post this on my website to spread the word.

[Ms. Stormie]

Originally posted by Americ@nBe@utyX
www.dontpayoj.com

I signed the petition.

I signed it too and passed it to everyone in my address book.

[martin II]

Originally posted by fbgweezer
*Snipped* Hmmm -- what happened to "There isn't any book and I'll go on the talk shows and call it crap. . . " LOL . . .we're waiting Mr. Lawyer.

He did make both statements. He now says that he did not know about the interview/book until the day it happened as oj did not inform him. I cannot understand the benefit of saying there is no book if he knew there would be one.?

martin II

[martin II]

http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/472890p-397774c.html

Ironically, Regan once rejected a manuscript about Nicole Brown Simpson because it didn't say enough salacious things about the murdered woman, her sister Denise Brown said in 2004.

"I had a million-dollar book deal, and that million-dollar book deal was with Judith Regan, and she didn't like the story that she got," Denise Brown told CNN's "Larry King Live" in 2004.

"She wanted to have the tabloid. She wanted to have the cocaine, the drugs, the dancing, all that stuff," Denise Brown said. "And I said, you know what? Nobody can pay me enough money to write a story like that about my sister."

[Kooly]

I signed it too, thanks for the link.

[martin II]

From Newsweek

comments by F.L. Bailey

Without having seen the TV show or the book, many people close to the case were left to speculate on what “no holds barred� items O. J. might have divulged. Lawyer F. Lee Bailey, part of the “Dream Team� that represented Simpson at the 1995 murder trial, says he isn’t so sure that his former client actually confesses to the two killings, even hypothetically. Bailey tells NEWSWEEK that he spoke to Simpson about the project earlier this year, before the news broke, and that Simpson had been “under some severe restrictions about what he could say" to him. “In essence, people pushed him for a book that did not say he was innocent—no one wants to read that,� Bailey says. “So supposedly they came up with a book that says, ‘I'm innocent because if I had done it, I would have done it this way'.� After talking with Simpson, Bailey says he’s convinced “It does not say he did it.�

Simpson himself has remained quiet. His attorney, Yale Galanter, could not be reached for comment. Regan, publisher of ReganBooks—which reportedly paid Simpson an advance of $3.5 million—told the Associated Press that Simpson came to her with the idea. She also did not respond to a request for comment.

CONTINUED

martin II

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by martin II
*snip*
‘I'm innocent because if I had done it, I would have done it this way'.�

This is just what I was thinking he was going to write. Another pathetic attempt to spin it into "I'm innocent". He's such a loser.

[StarShine]

I thought the money went to his kids. Please don't get offended, but in that case, why are you punishing them? Haven't they suffered enough?:confused:

[goatgirl]

Newsweek has a 3 pg story on the O.J Simpson book, its a pretty good read....


~~GoatGirl~~

[martin II]

This sound like some attempt to censure book sales in the u.s.imo
i guess some think that the public needs to be told what books they can buy.imo

martin II

[Heyes]

Originally posted by martin II
This sound like some attempt to censure book sales in the u.s.imo
i guess some think that the public needs to be told what books they can buy.imo

martin II

Not at all. He has the right to write it. But we have the right to protest.

[Heyes]

Originally posted by StarShine
I thought the money went to his kids. Please don't get offended, but in that case, why are you punishing them? Haven't they suffered enough?:confused:

The money went to OJ . He evidently doesn't rent anymore.

[fbgweezer]

Originally posted by StarShine
I thought the money went to his kids. Please don't get offended, but in that case, why are you punishing them? Haven't they suffered enough?:confused: And I thought that's why he wasn't going to pay the judgment -- he needed his money to raise his kids.

I bet he just needs extra $$ to pay for lap dances. ;)

[fbgweezer]

Originally posted by martin II
This sound like some attempt to censure book sales in the u.s.imo
i guess some think that the public needs to be told what books they can buy.imo

martin II

[fbgweezer]

Originally posted by martin II
This sound like some attempt to censure book sales in the u.s.imo
i guess some think that the public needs to be told what books they can buy.imo

martin II Sorry for the previous non-post.....

orenthal certainly has the right to write his book and the public certainly has the right to protest it being sold in stores we support. In fact, you could say this protest is a lot like his protest not to pay his judgment............:eek:

[StarShine]

Originally posted by Heyes


The money went to OJ . He evidently doesn't rent anymore.

What do you mean?:confused:

[martin II]

Originally posted by fbgweezer
And I thought that's why he wasn't going to pay the judgment -- he needed his money to raise his kids.

I bet he just needs extra $$ to pay for lap dances. ;)

fbg

i never hear oj said that was the reason he would not pay the judgement.

he did say
'I DIDN'T DO THE CRIME SO I WILL NOT PAY A DIME"

martin II

[StarShine]

Originally posted by martin II


fbg

i never hear oj said that was the reason he would not pay the judgement.

he did say
'I DIDN'T DO THE CRIME SO I WILL NOT PAY A DIME"

martin II

Would you? I certainly wouldn't.